The process of audit procedures for plant and equipment refers to those elements, which are required to be in compliance with the relevant revised as per the accounting standard determining the tangible items, which are
In respect with the needs to application as per the accounting standard 6 for the term plant and equipment comprises for holding up the purpose of providing the production of goods and services and there are some items, which are not for the purpose of usual mode of business. Judgement is required to be exercised in preconisation what constitutes an item of property, plant and equipment.
The auditor needs to obtain an in depth understanding of the clients and environment to considered inherent risk, which also consists of fraud and risks relating to the plant and equipment.
There is some of the misstatement in plant and equipment in respect of fraud and errors consists of the following:
An auditor is responsible for internal controls of the organisation relating to the plant and equipment in following ways:
The opening balance of the plant and equipment should be analysed from the records such as the scheduling the registers or ledger balances. In case of the initial engagement under the internal audit engagement, opening balance of plant and equipment must consider by the auditor for determining the accuracy of the opening balance of plant and equipment. Some of the audit procedure as laid down by the auditor includes that the evidence obtained from the assessment of the accounting records and other relevant information is a significant aspects of auditing standard. On the other hand, the auditor is under the obligation to procure the summary of the changes made to the plant and equipment in order to reconcile with the same to the ledgers (Bahr 2014).
The auditor is under the duty to verify the records so that he can ensure that the assets, which are under the construction mode or pending the installation and not ready for intended use of clarification as work in progress.
Capital work in progress must be verified with the reference to the underlying contractor and work orders, certification of work performance by independent persons by comparing with the expenses incurred up to date with the budgets and capital assets management policy and plan, pending commitments.
It is the duty of the auditor to ensure that a useful and appropriate method must be ensured to get hold of all directly identifiable costs which are capitalised in the work in progress as such expenses are not eligible to be capitalised as these are located and charged to revenue in normal cost (Maksymov et al 2012).
The auditor should test and check the calculation of depreciation and the total depreciation arrived should be compared with the figures of the preceding years in order to identify the reasons for the variations. The auditor must examine that the depreciation must be charged adequately in compliance with the accounting standard for depreciation.
Under the revised accounting standard the auditor must examine that each part of the item of plant and equipment having cost that is significant to the total cost of the item is depreciated separately.
The auditor should review the method of depreciation that is implemented to the assets at least at the end of the financial year to ascertain that the depreciation charged highlights the true and effective utilisation. A change in the method of depreciation should be appropriately changed in relation to the accounting estimates. Hence, the auditor must verify that those assets are under the construction or installation and cannot be depreciated until the equipment is effectively utilised for impairment.
The duty of the auditor is to verify that the business entity has been made for relevant disclosure of plant and equipment. The existing rights and restrictions during the course of construction for impairment of assets revaluation should be in accordance with the accounting standard, which is applicable to the business concern.
Abbott, L.J., Parker, S. and Peters, G.F., 2012. Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), pp.3-20.
Armstrong, C.S. and Vashishtha, R., 2012. Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(1), pp.70-88.
Bahr, N.J., 2014. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach. CRC Press.
Bock, K., 2016. Data Protection Certification: Decorative or Effective Instrument? Audit and Seals as a Way to Enforce Privacy. In Enforcing Privacy (pp. 335-356). Springer International Publishing.
Bondar, Y., 2016. Materiality of Established Errors in the Audit of Agricultural Business and Its Relationship with Documenting of Audit Procedures.Accounting and Finance, (1), pp.146-153.
Boyle, D.M., DeZoort, F.T. and Hermanson, D.R., 2015. The Effects of Internal Audit Report Type and Reporting Relationship on Internal Auditors' Risk Judgments. Accounting Horizons, 29(3), pp.695-718.
Daugherty, B.E., Dickins, D. and Fennema, M.G., 2012. Offshoring tax and audit procedures: Implications for US-based employee education. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(3), pp.733-742.
Gao, L. and Kling, G., 2012. The impact of corporate governance and external audit on compliance to mandatory disclosure requirements in China.Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 21(1), pp.17-31.
Guojun, W., Donghua, C. and Dequan, J., 2014. Does Differentiated Dividend Tax Affect Stock Valuation?. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 4, p.004.
Hayes, R.M., Lemmon, M. and Qiu, M., 2012. Stock options and managerial incentives for risk taking: Evidence from FAS 123R. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), pp.174-190.
Hodge, S., 2014. The Use and Effectiveness of the Internal Audit Function on an External Audit. Available at SSRN 2430851.
Howlett, D.C., Drinkwater, K.J., Lawrence, D., Barter, S. and Nicholson, T., 2013. Findings of the UK national audit evaluating image-guided or image-assisted liver biopsy. Part II. Minor and major complications and procedure-related mortality. Radiology, 266(1), pp.226-235.
Konchitchki, Y. and Patatoukas, P.N., 2013. Taking the pulse of the real economy using financial statement analysis: Implications for macro forecasting and stock valuation. The Accounting Review, 89(2), pp.669-694.
Krishnan, G.V., Lee, H.S., Patatoukas, P.N. and Wang, A.Y., 2015. Major customer dependency: Implications for audit pricing and quality. Available at SSRN 24400
MyAssigmenthelp.co.uk really nailed my assignment. They managed to deliver it on time even though I needed it in a day!
I need an English essay on the Romantic Age, but I didn't have much to spend. These guys did my essay at very cheap prices without affecting quality!
MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk really impressed me with the quality of the dissertation they delivered. It was absolutely flawless!
I thought I would not be able to get help for my epidemiology assignment anywhere but I got that with MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk, and it was a brilliant paper.
Honestly, guys, choose MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk the next time you need a paper. These people have simply the best writers in their team.
I never thought I would ever get an A grade on one of my assignments, but MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk made that dream come true!
I am really happy with the services I received from MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk. The paper was top notch and submitted on time.
Seriously, I think it's impossible to find even a single error in the assignments provided by MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk. I've ordered several, and each of them has been flawless!
I got the most amazing nursing case study I could have ever asked for! I am definitely ordering all my future assignments from here.