Bonanza Offer FLAT 20% off & $20 sign up bonus Order Now
Lesson Plan AnalysisAim of the Lesson Plan 1: The aim of the Lesson 1 is to excavate the effective teaching process. With the help of effective Lesson Plan, the teaching process can be improved for the children. The paper is trying to depict the use of household things to provide education to the children. Material availability in the classroom is helping the teachers to guide children in effective way. Lesson Plan:1 | |||||
Focus | References (Author, date and descriptive informational key words) | Explanation & evidence | |||
Is the outcome correctly taken from the relevant syllabus?
| 1.Board of Studies NSW (2012)- “Knowledge and Understanding Stage 2 Outcome”. 2.Killen (2012)- clear outcome
| Yes, the lesson outcome discourses “Knowledge and Understanding Stage 2 Outcomes” of Science Syllabus (Board of Studies NSW, 2012). The main idea of the lesson outcome is to deliver the key explanations regarding the concerned concept of study (Killen ,2012). | |||
Is the introduction suited to introducing the outcome? Does it engage the children in introducing the body of the lesson? Explain why or why not. Does it explain science, mathematics, or technology concepts/themes, which are important to the lesson outcome? | 1.Campbell (2009)- prior knowledge, learning 2. Mariotti (2009)-Strong introduction. | The introduction is not fully suited to introduce the outcome, as it does not fully inspire an anticipatory effect among students. According to Campbell (2009) it is a very crucial step. The teacher seems to have ignored this crucial step and thus has brought the students to start the lesson on an experiment. It however engages the student in learning about introducing the lesson’s body (Mariotti,2009). The introduction in lesson plan one clearly explains the concepts of sources of heat and its movement from one object to the other in line in context with the science themes. | |||
Is the body suited to the outcome? Does it help the children understand more fully, the science, mathematics, or technology concepts/themes important to the lesson outcome? Is the teacher actively engaged in extending knowledge in this part of the lesson? Consider the teaching strategies used in the body of the lesson and whether they are supporting learning.
| Saad et al (2014) -The lesson’s body must be related to the outcomes stated in the syllabus. Saraho&Spodek (2008) -Social collaboration is essential in science learning Hackathorn et al (2011) - teaching strategies, level of learning | The body is suited to the outcome and helps children to thoroughly understand the concept. However, they cannot understand the concept fully since the body is very brief and does not indicate all the inputs, questions, and directions that the teacher needs to give to students in order to achieve the lesson outcomes. According to Saad et al (2014) it is very important to relate the lesson’s body to its outcomes. However in lesson plan one, the teacher is not actively engaged in extending knowledge since the students have left to form groups on their own without any collaboration. Social communication is essential in science learning. The children can gain enough knowledge about regarding science through communicating with other children and even educators (Saracho&Spodek, 2008). In lesson plan one, the teacher has only intended to use ‘organizing’ as a teaching strategy. This strategy alone is not effective. Various methods of teaching strategies are essential to meet all the levels of children learning and will also reflect on children’s assessments (Hackathorn et al .,2011) | |||
In what ways is the conclusion summing up, or failing to sum up, the focus of the lesson? How are the children showing that they are learning the concepts/themes important to the lesson outcome?
| Moonsri&Pattanajak(2013). Conclusive activities, contents. | The conclusion is failing to sum up the focus of the lesson. Conclusive activities in lessons should be related to the contents taught in class to summarize student’s understanding regarding the lesson (Moonsri&Pattanajak ,2013). Children can show that they are learning the concept by correctly identifying and mentioning the different characteristics of heat sources and transfer of heat. | |||
Select one other aspect of the lesson plan that you identify as needing improvement. Explain what it is, and what is limiting about it.
| Fujii(2016)- extend and investigate their ideas, related resources , demonstrated lesson.
Charlesworth (2014)- resources of the lesson , lesson intention.
| The lesson plan needs an improvement especially in the ‘resources’ part. There is a little link between the lesson resources and its contents. As Fujiii(2016) mentioned, it is very essential for the children to explore their ideas and knowledge using related lesson resources. It should also be linked with the actual intentions of the lesson (Charlesworth ,2014). | |||
Lesson Plan ____2__Foundation Year Kindergarten |
| ||||
Focus | References (Author, date and descriptive informational key words) | Explanation & evidence |
| ||
Is the outcome correctly taken from the relevant syllabus?
|
Board of Studies (2012)- Knowledge and Understanding” for “Early Stage 1” in the syllabus. Capel &Breckton (2014)-Effective lesson outcomes
| Yes, the outcome is correctly taken from the syllabus. It addresses “Knowledge and Understanding Early Stage 1 Outcomes” of Science Syllabus (Board of Studies NSW, 2012). |
| ||
Is the introduction suited to introducing the outcome? Does it engage the children in introducing the body of the lesson? Explain why or why not. Does it explain science, mathematics, or technology concepts/themes, which are important to the lesson outcome? | Savage (2014)-Strong lesson introduction
Sackes,Trundle and Flevares (2009)-visual aid leads to comprehension
| By looking at lesson plan two the educator used the story of a cat which is not connected to the lesson objective. According to Savage (2014), it is very crucial to clearly relate the lesson introduction to the learning objectives as this will support children’s understanding regarding the lesson easily without any confusion or difficulty. Even though reading a story can be a beneficial approach to engage children, as it can improve the listening aspects by minimizing distractions that usually occur among the children in classrooms (Sackes et el.,2009).
|
| ||
Is the body suited to the outcome? Does it help the children understand more fully, the science, mathematics, or technology concepts/themes important to the lesson outcome? Is the teacher actively engaged in extending knowledge in this part of the lesson? Consider the teaching strategies used in the body of the lesson and whether they are supporting learning.
| Savage &Fautley (2013)-clear lesson body is essential in any lesson plan Copple&Bredekamp (2009)-Explaining as a teaching strategy
| The body is suited to the outcome and helps the children to understand the concepts on properties of different materials. Savage & Fautley (2013) suggested that lesson body should be clear and related to the lesson outcomes as it prepares the child’s mind to gain new information and also gives the educator a hint of where to focus regarding the student’s prior knowledge. The teacher should however, actively keep helping the students in using the internet to identify the necessary materials for group work. The teacher has opted to use ‘explaining’ as a teaching strategy (Copple&Bredekamp ,2009). This strategy therefore supports the outcome very effectively. |
| ||
In what ways is the conclusion summing up, or failing to sum up, the focus of the lesson? How are the children showing that they are learning the concepts/themes important to the lesson outcome?
| Hamm & Adams (2008). Effective conclusion
Hewitt, McKee, Hodge and Schuhler (2013)-The importance of linking the lesson conclusion to the real life settings. | The conclusion fails to sum up the focus of the lesson as merely playing with blocks will not be effective in understanding the characteristics of different materials. Effective conclusion in lesson planning increases student understanding level and assesses whether children have learned what was planned in the demonstrated lesson. (Hamm & Adams ,2008). A more well-organized method to conclude the lesson can be made by linking the conclusion of the lesson to the actual life setting (Hewitt et al.,2013), such as asking students about the different materials that can be found in their household. |
| ||
Select one other aspect of the lesson plan that you identify as needing improvement. Explain what it is, and what is limiting about it.
| Cole(2008)- different teaching methods to meet diverse learning style. | Teaching approaches are another aspect of the lesson that needs to be improved in order to boost learning knowledge. To achieve a successful lesson, it is vital to apply different methods of teaching as children gain information and knowledge from different sources (Cole,2008). |
|
Assessment Strategies:Open-ended questions have been raised to determine the actual concept of the content, asking students to reflect over their learning? Asking students to summarize learnt lessons demanding for hand signals from students on issues, misconception checks on concepts covered. Some questions might be used for assessment strategies through classroom activity assignments 1. Did the students observe the effect of heat moving from one object to another correctly? 2. Did the students identify some different ways in which heat is produced in their environment? for example by electricity or even burning. 3. Did students understand the meanings of key words and appropriately use them in responses (heat sources, natural, artificial, sun etc), Did students understand ways of preventing excessive heat and cold? |
Introduction:
Body:
Conclusion:
|
Lesson Evaluation: Were the children engaged? Was the class organized suitably for the introduction, body and conclusion of lesson? Was the focus of the lesson clear to the children? |
Since, it is necessary for a teacher to be effective with his/her teaching technique or style, the redesigning justifies the necessity. A teacher would have to consider individuality of every student, which also is justified by the restructuring of the lesson plan 1.
Lesson-plan 1 needed modification and few corrections for ensuring its effectiveness considering the students of stage 2 and 3 children belonging to 2 year. Initially plan didn’t seem to be effective. The outcome ensures explanation of the teaching process outcomes considering how effective the teaching strategy was (Anderson, 2015). Process outcome and content outcome are related and they must be determined by the syllabus. Thereafter, the study materials, which must be present in the list and a teacher must monitor for avoiding chaos during class (Moonsri&Pattanajak, 2013). As opined by Regan et al (2016), preparing on early stages is useful for a teacher to be effective in his teaching. Learning materials especially in science, technology and mathematics are crucial. Material availability in classroom can be helpful for teacher and students as well, as it helps teacher to be effective in teaching and students to grasp the exact notion behind learning (Moonsri&Pattanajak, 2013).
For sciences, technology and mathematics it important that a teacher first asks students to indicate what they know first regarding the topic of discussion(Fitzgerald, 2013). There was need to include these aspects in the redesigned lesson plan as the earlier plan only goes direct to experiments among students. According to He et al (2012), the introduction needs to set up the correct context of the contents of discussion and thus needs to include a reading of text by the teacher for student understanding. The body of a lesson requires a list of inputs that the teacher uses to teach and ensure content delivery (Hamm & Adams, 2008).This include experiments, asking and answering questions, bringing up relevant discussions, addressing student’s special concerns on teaching methodologies among others. In this regard, the body is thus the main part of the lesson and is the time when the teacher needs to use all the strategies that they can, not only to teach the students but also to address particular student needs, based on their general experience with each individual learner. The teaching strategy must exhaust all the planned action, including the effective use of materials listed. The redesigned lesson plan has expanded more on the lesson plan body to ensure that the teacher fully participates in taking the students through the steps of learning. It ensures that the teachers do not let students work on their own before understanding the concept fully.
Lastly, the conclusion for a lesson plan requires to be a terminative point where any further concerns and clarifications are sought for, finally discussed and an agreement arrived at (Froschauer,2010). The teacher should also leave students to engage in activities that are relevant to the objectives of the topic learnt, in order to inculcate understanding and use of acquired knowledge. The conclusion needs to include the summarizing of the lesson learnt, seeking for any further questions and concerns on the content (Fujii, 2016). The previous lesson plan provides a conclusion that is not relevant to the topic discussed in the lesson. Thus, there is need for relevant conclusion that ensures that outcomes have been met, at the end of the lesson.
Anderson,J.(2015).Affordance, learning opportunities, and the lesson plan pro forma.ELT Journal,69(3), 228-238.doi:10.1093/elt/ccv008
Board of Studies NSW. (2012). Science k-10 (incorporating science and technology k-6) syllabus. Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies NSW.
Campbell,L.(2009).Mindful learning : 101 proven strategies for student and teacher success.InB.Campbell(Ed.), Beginning With What Students Know(pp.7-21).Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
Capel, S., &Breckton, P. (2014). A practical guide to teaching physical education in the secondary school 2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Charlesworth, R. ( 2014). Math & science for young children (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Cole, R. W. (2008). Educating Everybody's Children : Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners(2nd Ed). Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD). Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/lib/sydney/detail.action?docID=10234676
Copple, C., &Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children
Fitzgerald, A. (2013). Learning and teaching primary science. Port Melbourne, Vic.: Cambridge University Press.
Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: a critical process of Lesson Study. ZDMMathematics Education, 48(4), 411-423. doi: 10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3
Froschauer,L.(2010). The frugal science teacher, PreK-5 : strategies and activities.Arlington, Va. :National Science Teachers Association
Hackathorn.J., Solomonb,E.D., Blankmeyerb, K., Tennialb,R.E.,& Garczynskib,A.M.(2011). Learning by Doing: An Empirical Study of Active Teaching Techniques. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2),40-54.Retreived from http://uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/Vol11_2/Hackathorn.pdf
Hamm, M. & Adams, D. (2008). Differentiated instruction for K-8 math and science. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
He, W., Zhang, S., Strudler, N., & Means, T. (2012). Integrating a case library with blogs for lesson planning activities. International Journal of Learning Technology, 7(2), 133-153. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2012.047979
Hewitt, K., McKee, C.C., Hodge, E., &Schuhler, R. (2013). Postercards from the schoolhouse: Practitioner scholars examine issues in instructional leadership. USA: NCPEA Publications.
Killen, R. (2012). Effective teaching strategies: Lesson from research and practice (4th Ed.). South Melbourne, Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia
Mariotti,A. P. (2009). Creating your teaching plan: A guide for effective teaching. Bloomington, IN: Author House
Moonsri, A. &Pattanajak, A. (2013). Lesson Planning in Primary School Using Lesson Study and Open Approach. Psychology, 04(12), 1064-1068.doi:10.4236/psych.2013.412155
Regan, K., Evmenova, A., Kurz, L., Hughes, M., Sacco, D., &Ahn, S. et al. (2016). Researchers Apply Lesson Study: A Cycle of Lesson Planning, Implementation, and Revision. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(2), 113-122. Retreived from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12101
Saad, A., Chung, P., & Dawson, C. (2014). Effectiveness of a case-based system in lesson planning. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 408-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12053
Sackes,M.,Trundle,K.C., &Flevares,L.M.(2009). Using children’s literature to teach standard-based science concepts in early years.Early Childhood Education Journal,36(5),415-422. doi: 10.1007/s10643-009-0304-5
Saracho, O.N., &Spodek, B. (2008). Contemporary perspectives on science and technology in early childhood education. United States of America: Information Age Publishing.
Savage,J.(2014).Lesson Planning: Key Concepts and Skills for Teachers.Retrieved from https://books.google.com.au/books?id=IBwWBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA68&dq=Savage+(2014)-Strong+lesson+introduction&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6if-tsafOAhWCjpQKHeZdDckQ6AEIGzAA#v=onepage&q=Savage%20(2014)-Strong%20lesson%20introduction&f=false
Savage,J.,&Fautley,M.(2013). Lesson Planning For Effective Learning.Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwsau/detail.action?docID=1595427
Upload your Assignment and improve Your Grade
Boost Grades