Bonanza Offer FLAT 20% off & $20 sign up bonus Order Now
The MD is concerned a recession may be on the way following the UK’s decision to exit the European Union. He believes the competitors are likely to reduce their prices and has asked you to look at the alternative costing technique of activity based costing (ABC) to see if it may help their position. He has asked you to;
Overhead Analysis Sheet |
||||||
Particulars |
Basis of apportionment |
Dept 1 |
Dept 2 |
Stores |
Maintenance |
Total |
Indirect materials– X3 model |
Allocation |
|
£ 63,000 |
|
|
£ 63,000 |
Heating and lighting |
Floor space (square metres) |
£ 183,556 |
£ 137,667 |
£ 68,833 |
£ 22,944 |
£ 413,000 |
Rent |
Floor space (square metres) |
£ 264,444 |
£ 198,333 |
£ 99,167 |
£ 33,056 |
£ 595,000 |
Depreciation of machinery |
Value of machinery (£) |
£ 28,866 |
£ 96,220 |
£ - |
£ 6,415 |
£ 131,500 |
Maintenance wages |
Maintenance calls |
£ 34,167 |
£ 47,833 |
£ - |
£ - |
£ 82,000 |
Machine insurance |
Value of machinery (£) |
£ 80,122 |
£ 267,073 |
£ - |
£ 17,805 |
£ 365,000 |
Factory supervisors salary |
Number of Inspections |
£ 36,364 |
£ 43,636 |
£ - |
£ - |
£ 80,000 |
Quality control |
Volume (cubic metres) |
£ 191,538 |
£ 111,731 |
£ 79,808 |
£ 31,923 |
£ 415,000 |
Total |
|
£ 819,057 |
£ 965,493 |
£ 247,808 |
£ 112,143 |
|
Reallocate Store cost |
Requisitions from stores |
£ 119,631 |
£ 128,176 |
-£ 247,808 |
£ - |
£ - |
Reallocate Maintenance |
Machine hours |
96,674.65 |
15,467.94 |
- |
(112,142.59) |
£ - |
Actual Overhead costs |
|
£ 1,035,363 |
£ 1,109,137 |
£ - |
£ - |
£ - |
Absorption overhead rates |
Dept 1 |
Dept 2 |
Actual Overhead costs |
£ 1,035,362.51 |
£ 1,109,137.49 |
Machine hours |
£ 250,000.00 |
£ 40,000.00 |
Labour hours (A grade) |
£ 140,000.00 |
£ 60,000.00 |
Labour hours (B grade) |
£ 20,000.00 |
£ 30,000.00 |
Absorption rates |
|
|
Per machine hour |
£ 4.14 |
|
Per labour hour |
|
£ 12.32 |
The per machine hour rate is mainly chosen as the absorption rate for department 1. The machine rate is actually chosen due to the high machinery usage conducted by department 1 in comparison with labour usage. In addition, per labour hour rate is mainly chosen as the absorption rate for department 2. Moreover, in department 2 relatively labour usage is high in comparison with machine hour usage, thus labour hour rate is used for absorption costing. Dung and Aoki (2014) stated that use of absorption costing allows companies to depict the minimum costs incurred for producing a relative product.
Particulars |
Amount |
Amount |
Direct Material Costs |
£ 1,770,000.00 |
|
Direct Labour Costs (A grade) |
£ 82,500.00 |
|
Direct Labour Costs (B grade) |
£ 255,000.00 |
|
Prime Cost |
|
£ 2,107,500.00 |
Production Overhead |
|
|
Labour Costs |
£ 1,109,137.49 |
£ 1,109,137.49 |
Total Production Cost |
|
£ 3,216,637.49 |
Total units produced |
|
300,000.00 |
Per Unit cost |
|
£ 10.72 |
Activity based costing mainly allows companies to effectively manage its overhead cost and take adequate decisions. In addition, it also allows companies to take adequate decision regarding continuity of different operations. Ruiz-de-Arbulo-Lopez, Fortuny-Santos and Cuatrecasas-Arbos (2013) stated that activity based costing is mainly used by companies with low overhead costs, as it helped in reducing excess expenditure and increase profitability. However, there are some advantage and disadvantages of ABC method, which are depicted as follows.
Advantages if Activity Based Costing:
Disadvantages if Activity Based Costing:
After the overall evaluation of merits and demotes of ABC method, it is seen that use of new costing method could only increase expenses of the company. In addition, there is a relative chance of a recession, which will in turn increase expenditure and reduce profitability of the company. However, the current absorption system has effectively depicted the relative costs of each product. Nevertheless, the use of ABC method could only helps in decreasing the cost of X1 and X2 products, while increment in costs of X3 products could be seen. In this context, Kaplan and Anderson (2013) stated that activity based costing helps organisation to shut the production process, which does not provide adequate return from investment. On the contrary, Marx (2016) argued that the high inclusion of costs identified by ABC method mainly decrease motivation level of management in time of recession.
Seeing the advantages it could be possible, for Eriksen Ltd to use Activity based costing in their costing valuation. In addition, this could mainly help in depicting the accurate costs of each product, which could in turn help the company make adequate adjustment to selling price of X1, X2 and X3 product. Frazier (2014) mentioned that activity based costing allows management to identify wasteful products, which is hamper profitability of the company. On the other hand, Balakrishnan, Labro and Soderstrom (2014) criticises that activity based costing needs high-end costs, which could raise the current expenses and hamper profitability of the company. Thus, use of Activity based costing in Eriksen Ltd could effectively help the company improve their position if UK is being hit by a recession.
Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E. and Soderstrom, N.S., 2014. Cost structure and sticky costs. Journal of management accounting research, 26(2), pp.91-116.
Dung, N.T.P. and Aoki, M., 2014. The Evolution of Management Accounting Practices in Vietnam-a Survey research on Vietnamese food and beverage enterprises.
Frazier, W.E., 2014. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23(6), pp.1917-1928.
Kaplan, R. and Anderson, S.R., 2013. Time-driven activity-based costing: a simpler and more powerful path to higher profits. Harvard business press.
Marx, C., 2016. An activity-based costing approach to fall of ground accidents in a South African gold mine.
Ruiz-de-Arbulo-Lopez, P., Fortuny-Santos, J. and Cuatrecasas-Arbós, L., 2013. Lean manufacturing: costing the value stream. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(5), pp.647-668.