The Agile Project Management

Question:

Write an essay on The agile project management.

Answer:

The agile project management refers to the innovative method utilized for the purpose of project management. Therefore, the agile project can be regarded as one of the latest project management stratagem that is primarily implemented in the area of software development.  The process of software development in a business might perhaps follow different procedures that include the waterfall model. However, with the development of the software development, technologies as well as business requirements and needs, the traditional models cannot profoundly cater to the needs of the business (Antlova, 2014). Accordingly, this calls for the need of a more flexible software progression models that are necessary in a bid to address the agility of the requirements. This necessitated the process of development of the agile software improvement models.  

The current report outlines the different advantages as well as disadvantages of the agile approach after detailed review of the systematic literature on the agile approach methodologies. Agile is essentially referred to as an umbrella term that can be utilized for identification of the different models that can be suitably used for the purpose of agile progression, for instance Scrum (Carroll, 2012). Owing to the fact that the agile development models are different from the conventional models, agile project management can be considered as a specific region in project management. The agile process calls for the need of acquirement of extensive knowledge and understanding as regards the entire agile project development process. 

Issues or areas of concern  

The major areas of concern in the process of agile project management include the project cost. Most importantly, the agile projects neither have fixed price nor fixed schedules. In addition to this, the projects are generally open-ended and continuously transform with changes in requirements. As a result, it becomes challenging for the manager as well as the clients to understand this particular technique as the clients intends to be aware of the overall costs of the project (Crowder & Friess, 2014). Again, the other major areas of concern include the capability for managing an advanced concept and especially the laggards do not want to deal with the new approaches. The agile process always seeks different alternatives to the earlier traditional models of project management. Innovators who pursue new principles can easily adopt the new project management approach. In addition to this, another downfall of utilizing the agile methodologies especially in the software industry encompasses around consumer collaboration. Furthermore, Crowder & Friess (2014) pointed out that the feature of agility and the fixed price are not at all mutually exclusive. 

Scope of the Agile Project Management

As rightly put forward by Dinsmore & Cabanis-Brewin (2014), the overall team working together in an agile project is accountable for handling the team and it includes not only the responsibility of the manager. Therefore, in cases to processes as well as procedures, the general or common perception is utilized over the written strategies. This helps the management in avoiding the any delay in the overall process of decision- making and therefore assists in making faster progression. Furthermore, the agile project management also helps in demonstration of different leadership skills as well as competencies that in turn helps in motivating others. However, the agile project also facilitates as well as coordinates different activities as well as resources that that are required for maintenance of both quality of projects as well as rapid development (Gray & Larson, 2014).  

Reason for adoption

The idea of attaining better business outcomes directs the corporations to adopt the agile project management (Gray & Larson, 2014). There are essentially several reasons for companies to adopt the agile technology for the purpose as it helps in quicker time to market, incurring early return on investment, feedback from the customers, development of the right products, fast detection of risk and enhancing quality, culture as well as morale. In addition to this, adoption of the agile project management also helps in increasing efficiency by reducing waste, increasing the satisfaction of the customers, better alignment between the efforts and real business outcomes (Gray & Larson, 2014). It can be hereby ascertained that the agile project management helps in arriving at better business outcomes by lessening the time of the delivery cycles along with the quarterly tempo of the projects Therefore it helps the firms in moving to the market at a faster pace. In addition to this, the traditional information system and the projects have a history and the experience of failure of delivering different business needs, match the cost, quality as well as time and realize advantages despite extensive research and development of best business practices. 

Agile is needed as the consequences of the failure are very much expensive to either start the new systems to attain the advantage plan or else to start a development project. The failure factors mainly include the mix of different people, selection and use of technology as well as other methodology concerns (Indelicato, 2012). The factors of people failure include refers to the poor communication in the team, inadequacy of vision, poor management of the stakeholders and the altering requirements when the problem based on technology encompasses around the hardware as well as software components that are not operating as anticipated and growing costs along with dissimilar delivery timelines. The failure to follow different project and business management practices can also influence the chances to succeed. The Association for Project Management is therefore calls for the need of inculcating knowledge for the purpose of management of the project. Therefore, it includes the knowledge regarding different project management standards as well as methods that form a competency structure that in turn provides a guide for management of the hard as well as soft skills of the project, counting the relationship management as well as benefits realization (Indelicato, 2016). Although there are several projects as well as benefit approaches, the corporations follow an identical life cycle for the purpose of comparison. 

However, the level of adoption as well as the realistic usage is also very significant for extensive application of the agile processes, instruments, tools as well as techniques. Juricek (2014) indicates that different bodies of expertise that essentially underpins organizations is properly documented as well as supported, however, there are several empirical studies that explicitly associate as well as explore the outcomes of the information system enhancement projects that might perhaps be affected by the processes of interaction between the major processes, roles as well as tools and procedures. This particular study can help in adding different tools and techniques in the professional documentation process along with other training materials and thereby help in the expansion of the body of knowledge for the development of the agile project development. The different important findings of the study can also provide further information to the project sponsors on different factors that influence the process of adoption of the agile project development approach and the concentrates on different best practices of the business throughout the entire life cycle of the project (Lalsing, 2012). Therefore, it is the aim and purpose of  the present study o identify the gaps in the process of adoption of the agile process and to devise procedures to bridge the gaps and start the exploration of the usage on non information technology as well as innovative projects.

Concerns for review the literature  

There exists a wide section of literature that illustrates different techniques and instruments of agile methodologies and researches on adoption. Nevertheless, the different usages chiefly occur in the software development in addition to innovation. Therefore, quite a few corporations have taken into consideration the implementation of agile course of action in response to the customary failure of IT delivery by way of the traditional project management advance (Layton, 2012). 

Overall trends  

The agile project management integrates different tools as well as techniques for identification of the stakeholders as well as different influence networks along with suggestions on process of incorporation of stakeholder management into a particular project management procedure (Layton, 2012). These particular tools are generally applied in a waterfall approach that sequentially illustrates each phase of the project. The different phases of waterfall approach include definition of the requirements, development of the solution, building as well as deployment (Layton, 2012). Team of experts have outlined different trends in the agile project management that includes the permanency of the agile projects, widening strategic course of  actions of different project managers, elementary components of change management, handling different business complexities. 

The trends in agile project management also includes up skilling talents, design thinkers, significance of portfolio as well as programme management, diversity issues, global groups and distributed works, spread of project management into different non-project management areas (Lester, 2014). The significance of the agile project management facilitates organization to work smartly and help the employees to grasp different agile manner of thinking that help them to move the mindset.

Conflicts in theory

There are conflicting theories of agile project management and the implementation of the project management. The key principles of agile management focuses on permitting change, responsive planning procedure, frequent as well as continuous business practices, direct engagement of the stakeholders, regular direct communications and the policies for minimization of the waste (Mathis, 2014). The project management system of the corporation needs to incorporate the agile process in the existing process of the process management. Therefore, there arises the possibility of the conflict in principles and theories in the two systems. 

The process of embracing the change in the agile project management is conflicted with the project management that faces difficulty in managing the overall change in the environment of the business practices (Mathis, 2014). The conflicting points include the focus of the agile management on the satisfaction of the consumers as well as increased customer interaction. However, the traditional project management approaches focuses on the plans as well as artifacts. The agile management process refers to change through the adaptive course of action. On the contrary, the traditional approach refers to the changes through adoption of the corrective action. The conflicting points also refer to the traditional as well as agile project management planning process (Medinilla, 2012). The agile management process incorporates the process of rolling wave process of planning whereas on the other the traditional project management process refers to the up-front planning. In addition to this, the customer centric agile project management includes the time-boxed delivery system and on the other hand, the traditional method of project management includes the scope- based process of delivery. 

Again, the agile process of management of project incorporates the commitment management through the proper characteristic breakdown framework however the traditional project management works through the activity management that operates through the work breakdown approach (Medinilla, 2012). Furthermore, the agile process of the project management refers to the collaboration based on the self-disciplined as well as self-organizing work groups, whereas the traditional project management follows the top down process. The theories and concepts of the traditional project management also present conflicting concepts that are different from the agile project management (Medinilla, 2012). The project management that follows the agile process concentrates on the negligible set of context that essentially includes the sensitive as well as the generative business practices. However, the traditional project management process conducts the business processes that are primarily prescriptive that follows the heavyweight concepts (Miller, 2013). 

Conclusions

Gaps in research as well as scholarship

Several limitations in research as well as scholarships need to be taken into consideration for assessment of the overall process of agile project management. The present study presents a detailed study of only the existing research articles that are included in the research study. Again, the review only takes into consideration the article that is available in full texts (Moran, 2014). Therefore, all these factors question the validity of the review and the accuracy of the study in a very negative manner. Again, another limitation or gap that can be identified as regards the agile methodologies is the way the agile process handles the large teams involved in the process (Moran, 2014). Development of the agile process of the project management is very complicated especially for big teams, as coordinating large interfaces become a central issue. Again, strong focus on untimely results in huge systems can show the way to a major modification at the time when structural design cannot scale up. 

Establishment of the reason for reviewing the literature or undertaking the scan

The primary reasons behind reviewing the literature are to summarize the present evidence regarding a treatment or else the technology. Therefore, in other words, primary reason behind reviewing the literature is mainly to summarize different empirical evidences of the advantages as well as limitations of a particular agile method (Sheedy & Sankaran, 2013). Another reason behind reviewing the literature is to identify the gaps in the current study in a bid to identify with different areas for examination. The reason for review also includes the necessity to provide a framework or else the background for suitable positioning of the new research activities.

Criteria for evaluation as well as comparison of the literature

The criterions that help in the evaluation as well as comparison of the literature are as stated below:

The systematic review of the literature refers to the creation of the review protocol. The review protocol states the research questions that the project intends to address and the procedures to be used for the review. Again, the criterion for the review of the literature also includes a defined strategy that can be used for conducting the review. The intention and purpose of the search strategy is to point out the maximum number of pertinent literature. 

Research Studies and other types of literature

- Theoretical articles

Background and motivation 

Concepts that are necessary to comprehend the current subject matter can be studied in the current report on the agile project management. This study also helps in understanding the ways of overcoming different barriers of project management. 

Project Management 

As rightly put forward by Sheedy & Sankaran (2013), Project management refers to the application of knowledge, competence and skills, tools as well as methods to different project actions with the purpose of attainment of the set target of the particular project. In accordance with PMBOK, the task is entirely time-framed attempt undertaken to accomplish the goal at closing stages from the perspective of the product development, delivery of service, agenda, and structuring or else insignificant issue of the goal of human accomplishment. Again, the Software project preparation has primarily three common approaches that count the experience, typical guidelines, as well as supporting mechanisms. However, the skilled project managers depend upon past understanding with the purpose of generation of plans and make use of documents as well as guiding principles from different completed projects. However, the project schemes offer the foundation for scheming and thereby provide the benchmark against which the entire performance can be enumerated. Sheedy & Sankaran (2013),  opines that the Project managers can make use of a variety of support tools for the development of the software project scheme. The important tools for measurement and project plan helps in generating Gantt charts, different milestone papers as well as PERT graphs (Program Evaluation and Review Technique). 

Agile Project Management

As rightly put forward by Rossberg & Olausso  (2012), the agile software improvement is essentially an iterative technique of setting up as well as guiding a project. The life cycle of an agile project that primarily starts with the determination of the features of the stakeholders also includes different candidates for addition in the product (Rossberg & Olausson, 2012). Again, the owners of the product can influence as well as leverage different input of the stakeholder for the purpose of writing epics that are huge user stories that need to be split into different smaller pieces. Again, the Agile Software Development (ASD) refers to the perception of iterative cycles in which different segments are necessarily unified and each of these stage acts as the feedback system for the other phases (Rossberg & Olausson, 2012). However, this section represents the significant concepts and methods of agile software improvement method that in turn can help in understanding the agile notions.

The goal of the review can help in studying the gap in the identified methodologies by carrying out a comprehensive evaluation of different agile methodologies. However, the review procedure essentially involves assessment of different agile advances that primarily includes the Extreme Programming (XP), Scrum process, Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM), Feature Driven Development (FDD) as well as the Adaptive Software Development (ASD) that highlights distinctiveness of agile projects (Ruhe & Wohlin, 2014). The review section also presents criticisms regarding the restrictions of the agile systems. Subsequently, the review section also presents the challenges related to the accomplishment of agile method in the software business in keeping with software practitioners as well as anecdotal substantiation.

Agile Modeling

Agile modeling refers to the excellence of being swift that ensures the promptness for attaining motion; liveliness, movements as well as agility in motion (Ruhe & Wohlin, 2014). Therefore, the software development procedures intends to explanation regarding the business community that asks for lighter weight together with faster and lively course of action for software development. Agile Modeling methods therefore include the Adaptive Software Development (ASD) and Scrum process among many others. The methodologies can be approved as superior quality software as well as customer contentment can be attained by way of incorporating light policy to the overall procedure. Among several agile methodologies, some are hereby illustrated below:

Adaptive Software Development (ASD)

Adaptive Software Development (ASD), mainly proffers an agile as well as adaptive advance to high-speed plus high-change software projects (Schwalbe, 2014). Therefore, it is quite impossible to plan effectively in a promptly moving and changeable business atmosphere. Most importantly in ASD, the static scheme design life cycle of the project can be reinstated by an active speculate-integrate-learn life sequence.

The focal point of ASD is primarily on three different non-linear as well as overlying phases that includes the speculation, integration as well as learning (Spundak, 2014). The phase of speculation refers to the definition of the mission of the project and realization of unclear aspects. The next phase includes the collaboration that essentially focuses on the significance of the group work for development of different change procedures. The next phase includes that of the learning that stresses the necessity for realizing the mistakes and different requirements that might perhaps change during the process of development.  

Extreme Programming (XP)

As opined by Spundak (2014), the Extreme programming (XP) has mainly transformed from different issues that lead to the improvement cycles of conventional development models. Again, short improvement cycles, incremental process of planning and preparation, constant feedback, dependence on communication, as well as evolutionary blueprint, can inevitably typify the extreme programming that is also simply known as the XP process. A summary of XP terms and practices is shown below

Spundak, (2014) opines that the lifecycle of XP project is categorized into six different phases that includes the phases of examination, Planning, Iterations to discharge, manufacture, Maintenance as well as Death. 

However, in the phase of Exploration, the customer writes out clearly the requirement that they wish to be included in the program (Stare, 2014). Subsequently, this exploration phase leads to the stage of Planning where a priority order is determined and the schedule for the entire project is developed. This leads to the Iterations phase that refers to the improvement team that is responsible to generate a system out of the architecture of the entire system then incessantly integrates as well as tests different codes. Additional testing as well as checking of the presentation of the entire system can be released to the target customer that is mainly conducted in the stage of Production (Stare, 2014). Deferred ideas as well as suggestions discovered during this phase can be properly documented for implementation at a later stage in the upgraded releases that are carried out at the maintenance phase. lastly, the death Phase refers to the stage when the client have no other requirements to be executed and all the indispensable credentials of the structure can be registered as no other alterations in the structural design or else the code is carried out (Stare, 2014). 

Scrum 

As rightly put forward by Pham & Pham (2012), the Scrum refers to an iterative as well as an incremental procedure for development of product as well as handling of the projects. However, the Scrum focuses on way members of a project management can carry out the operations in a bid to create the system flexibility in a continually altering surroundings. However, at the time of termination of the iteration, it creates a possible set of operations. However, the term scrum refers to the teamwork and do not require or else offer any definite software development procedure that companies can appropriately utilize (Pham & Pham, 2012). The process also calls for the need of certain business management practices as well as tools in diverse phases of Scrum to keep away from the disorder and confusion created by randomness in addition to complexity. 

Key Scrum practices and process includes the following:

Product Backlog - Product Backlog reveals the presents the list of different features as well as transformations that are within the system and are wanted by different numerous actors that includes the clientele, marketing as well as sales along with project team (Pham & Pham, 2012). However, the Product Owner is accountable for maintenance of the Product Backlog.

Sprints – Again, the Sprints are essentially a process that spans for 30-days. This process essentially refers to the procedure of familiarizing oneself to the altering situational variables that necessarily refers to the different requirements, definite time, available resources, adequate knowledge as well as technology among many others (Pham & Pham, 2012). This essentially needs to result in shippable increase of specific software. However, different working tools of the project team of the corporation refer to the Planning different Meetings for the Sprint, keeping track of the Sprint Backlog as well as Daily Scrum gathering.

Sprint planning meeting –This meeting is essentially attended firstly by different clientele, users, administration, Product possessor as well as Scrum Team in which different goals as well as functionality are discussed in detail. 

Sprint Backlog – Sprint Backlog presents a list of characteristics that is presently allocated to a exacting Sprint. As soon as all the features are finished, a fresh iteration of the scheme is automatically delivered (Pham & Pham, 2012).

Daily Scrum – Daily Scrum refers to a regular meeting for takes place for just about 15 minutes and is organized to keep up to date with the improvement of the Scrum Team and concentrate on any barrier faced by the project panel.

Feature Driven Development (FDD)

As rightly mentioned by Stark (2014), the FDD advance consists of frequent as well as tangible deliverables together with precise process for keeping track of the development of the report. However, the FDD includes five chronological steps that refer to the improvement of a model on the whole, developing list of different characteristic features, setting up of the features, scheming by the features and subsequently creating by the features. 

General features and the identified weaknesses of the Agile Methodologies 

Method Key Elements Significant Features Identified Weakness

ASD Adaptive style and culture, group effort, mission-driven element founded iterative improvement (Torrance, 2014) corporations are observed as adaptive ones that in turn generates an emergent order from the  web of interrelated persons ASD deals with  concepts as well as culture than overall process of the software practice (Torrance, 2014)

XP Customer driven progress, small panel, every day builds Refactoring that refers to the process of continuing redesign of the method to get better and to improve the performance as well as responsiveness to different  changes Individual practices are appropriate for different situations; on the whole view while business management practices are given paid relatively less attention (White, 2013).

SCRUM self-governing, small development teams, 30-day cycles for release put into effect a paradigm reallocation from distinct as well as repeatable to process of product development Although Scrum illustrates in detail the process of management of the overall cycle of the 30-day release, the incorporation and acceptance examinations are not properly illustrated (White, 2013)

FDD Five-step procedure, object oriented constituent technique effortlessness, design and put into practice different method by  features as well as  object modeling FDD concentrates on design as well as implementation (Wysocki, 2012). 

Key characteristics of the Agile Methods 

Key Characteristics Agile Process

Approach Adaptive

Success record Business worth

Size of the project Small

Style and process of Management Decentralized

Perspective towards to alteration Change Adaptability

Culture Leadership alliance

Documentation minute

Prominence People leaning

Phase or else cycle Several

Domain Exploratory or else random

Straight Planning Minimal

Return on investment Early in project

Size  of Team Small

Limitations of the Agile Methodologies 

The principal limitation of agile methodologies is regarding the process of management of bigger teams. However, the agile development is more complicated for larger team grows in size. The process also faces difficulty in harmonizing different interfaces that can become a prevailing issue (Wysocki, 2012).  However, the Agile process also faces the limitation of the face-to-face communication that breaks down and thereby become hard as well as multifaceted with different developers. On the contrary, heavyweight as well as plan-driven technique scales better for huge projects.

The agile methodology stresses on the satisfaction of the customer through premature as well as incessant delivery of important software (Wysocki, 2012). The limitation of the process also includes excessive focus on different outcomes in huge systems that can lead to reworks at the time when the structural design has the possibility to get better and scale up in the system. The plan-driven method is essential for the high guarantee software modeling for agile projects to life-critical methods. However, the Heavyweight traditional objectives that include the inevitability, repeatability, as well as process of optimization are repeatedly nature of reliable safety, vital software development among many others. The agile procedures do not uphold conventional walkthroughs as well as code examination for the period of the entire life cycle of the project. Therefore, it stresses on pair programming as well as informal reviews as their quality management system. 

Case studies

The present case study scrutinizes the advance undertaken by the company Snowden Technologies in implementing a variety of agile methods for their operations that is for their product as well as routine software solutions for the specific mining business (Indelicato, 2012). However, the catalyst to assume a range of agile methods arose from the enlargement of the entire development team and the requirement for additional assimilation of different development actions. The management of Snowden Technologies occupied the users that counts the solution developers, different project supervisors, Team managers, and Geologists among many others an upfront and illustrated the scope of the projects. This in turn helped in adoption of definite techniques from a variety of different agile methodologies that includes the FDD, XP among many others. However, the chosen agile techniques that refers to the  iterative advance, Domain Object form, code examination as well as automated testing were integrated into a constant software procedure that includes diverse “value add” assimilated with different development technique (Indelicato, 2016). 

Another case study that outlines the success of the Agile process is that of the FBI Sentinel project. It is a large-scale venture that developed critical technology after the traditional waterfall attempts failed to deliver the requirements. FBI Sentinel projects also illustrate the flaws of the waterfall approach and describe the way the agile leadership delivered when the traditional project management failed. This case is pertinent as this was a sophisticated as well as mission based project of the government. FBI was utilizing the old technology in order to record facts but the treatment of the Oklahoma City Bombing case aptly highlighted the shortages of the old technology of FBI (Wysocki et al., 2014). Thereafter they chose the “Agile development” process. The scheme selected the Scrum Method, where a Scrum Master coordinated and led entire the improvement team. This is a role different from that of a project manager in a waterfall project. The sum spent on the failed endeavors to replace the old system amounted to $597m for a period of 10 long years the agile project only cost an amount of $114m for a period of 3 years (Wysocki et al., 2014). The process of light management of the team along with tight management discipline helped in the achievement of the success of the project. FBI Sentinel project also assisted in delivering different promises, controlling the transformation, getting people together by way of generation of trust through the apt that follows the light tight process and face to face exchange of ideas. 

Conclusions

Summary of the major contributions of significant studies as well as articles 

The agile project is accountable for defining as well as maintaining the entire constitution of the solution and helps in making it certain that the resultant solution will meet up the necessities. Again, agile framework also aids the group to work jointly in an agile manner, to equally have possession of the solution and to interface properly with other areas of the corporation. The studies on agile project management help in understanding the requirements, thereafter helps in formulating the design for creation of the solution. Again, the extensive study on the systematic literature also helps us in communicating the entire architecture and helping the developers to realize the architecture (Lester, 2014). In addition to this, the systematic literature also aids in defining the process of verification of the process of the implementation of the system in order to ensure that the delivered system suitably meets the requirements. 

Evaluation of the current state of the art for the body of knowledge reviewed 

 The review of the body of knowledge on the agile project management reveals that the agile approach to the project management is an advanced system and can be considered to be good for various reasons. But at the same time, the review of the systematic literature also reflects the fact that the agile approach call for the need of various things that can be considered as disadvantage. As rightly pointed out by Lester (2014), the agile project management can be regarded to be very much demanding from the perspective of the users as it requires active involvement of the users as well as close collaboration through the process of development of the project. In addition to this, the scrutiny of the entire process refers to the fact that the requirement that helps in designing the solution constantly changes throughout the period of development. Furthermore, the agile requirements are also hardly adequate. This is because requirements are elucidated at the time of development and is necessarily documented with lesser details (Antlova, 2014). Nevertheless this implies that the information obtainable to fresh starter in the group about attribute and the manners of the operations. Again, the process of testing that ensures the quality of the project is assimilated throughout the lifecycle of the project and do not require the test stage at the time of the completion of the project. However, this means that the testers are required throughout the project that in turn raises the overall cost of the project (Carroll, 2012). Nonetheless, the tradeoff between the advantage and the disadvantage reveals that agile approach is worthwhile. The people are complicated so are the software, and the change is the only constant thing in today’s projects. Therefore, the lethal combination of the changeability can be helped by the agile notions. 

Major methodological flaws and gaps in research 

The major flaws that can be identified in the agile methodologies as studied in the systematic literature orients around the adaptive nature of the process and the people orientation of the methods. As rightly reflected in the literatures on agile methodologies, the approach is strictly adaptive rather than being predictive. Therefore, the approach intends to become effective solutions or else processes that adapt as well as thrive on the changes even to the position of altering themselves. 

Reflective Report 

Overall Strength and Weakness 

With implementation of several projects with Agile Methodology, the corporation can learn several lessons through the reflective business practices in different forms of different retrospectives. Therefore, the reflective report helps companies to understand the advantages as well as the disadvantages of conducting projects using the agile methodologies. I work for a corporation where my primary goal is to expose myself to different domains as well as environment and to start working in projects that are incorporating the agile process. Therefore, I want to get various perspectives and observe the agile developments at diverse scales, and assist in distribution of the successes as well as face the challenges. I also intend to find answers for implementation of the project. The agile project management in or company can help the company to avoid a huge dependencies in the software development projects. Therefore, it becomes important to reorganize the work, as there are no dependencies anymore. The traditional methods such as the waterfall method follow a sequential process where the completion of one phase is completely dependent on the successful completion of the previous phase.  A thorough study and training on the agile project management has helped me to understand that the agile project management divides the overall project into several groups or slices where each stage of the project is not dependent on the other. However, there are huge amount of interdependence across different agile project teams. Therefore, this creates cross functional groups that are essentially customer centric and are focused on removal of the dependencies. The project management in the traditional form in our company also has a worldwide, cross-time sectoral development; therefore, the stand up times are therefore unfeasible. Therefore, it is imperative to restructure different agile teams in order to ensure that everyone works together. The new agile project management therefore can help s to get rid of the barriers and the walls between the different members of the groups participating in the accomplishment of different projects. In addition to this, as a member of the agile project we need to make it certain that everyone is working in pairings and especially for bonus points everyone in the agile project management need to use PowerBooks. 

As a member of the agile project management group, I have gathered the knowledge as regards creation of a plan or else solutions that can address issues of the projects. Accordingly, my experience regarding the agile project management helps me to understand that the creation of the plan is comparatively easy in comparison to the implementation of the plan as it poses the problem of several unforeseen issues that are quite aching and take quite a long time. The process of using agile project management also calls for the need of addressing quality issues that include the training the people and carrying out the test automation to ensure that the activities fall into correct places. As I am working in an organization that used to follow the traditional approach to the project management, therefore, it is difficult to try to generate a cross-functional system of the agile management. Therefore, the company might face the difficulty of the headcount concerns, territorial concerns, knowledge of the domain as well as the specialization concerns. However, in spite of all the difficulties that might be faced for the implementation of the agile projects and the management wants to alter the process of project management. This is because, the agile project management permits good development that ultimately results in the production of different saleable products even at the time when the entire project is operating successfully. The incremental deliver system of the agile project management also helps to shorten the time to market as it reduces the overall cycle of the delivery. Therefore, this process might perhaps result in the acquiring higher revenue. In addition to this, scrutinizing each sprint even before being transferred to the next phase implies that the process of testing is carried out throughout the process that in turn allows different teams to alter the scope as well as the directions of the entire project at any moment in time. Despite the fact that the deadlines as well as the budgets of the project the variables are fixed, the requirements of the proects are set to become fixed. The stakeholders as well as the participants expect changes in the same way along the process of development of the project. Furthermore, my experience of working in both the traditional as well as in the present agile project management group in the company has also helped me to understand that involvement of the owners also facilitate the changes in the entire process of project management. However, my experiences of working in the present agile project in the company have helped me to understand that there are also certain problems associated to the agile project management. This is apparent from the difficulties that the managers face owing to the lack in the clarity in the definition of the work associated to the planning, devising strategies and structures and in organizing the project.

References

Antlova, K. (2014). Agile Approach in the Project Management of the Czech Companies. Procedia Technology, 16, 929-933. 

Carroll, J. (2012). Agile project management in easy steps. Warwickshire, United Kingdom: In Easy Steps.

Crowder, J. & Friess, S. (2014) Agile project management.

Dinsmore, P. & Cabanis-Brewin, J.(2014) The AMA handbook of project management.

Gray, C. & Larson, E. (2014)Project management.

Indelicato, G. (2012). Making Sense of Agile Project Management: Balancing Control and Agility. Proj Mgmt Jrnl, 43(3), 78-78. 

Indelicato, G. (2016). Agile for Project Managers. Proj Mgmt Jrnl, 47(1), e4-e4. 

Juricek, J. (2014). Agile Project Management Principles. LNSE, 172-175. 

Lalsing, V. (2012). People Factors in Agile Software Development and Project Management. IJSEA,3(1), 117-137. 

Layton, M. (2012). Agile project management for dummies. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

Lester, A.(2014) Project management, planning and control.

Mathis, B. (2014)Agile Project Management for Beginners.

Medinilla, A. (2012). Agile management. Heidelberg: Springer.

Miller, G. (2013). Going Agile. Atlanta: Maxmetrics LLC.

Moran, A. (2014)Agile risk management.

Morgan, P. (2012). Agile project management for mission critical it projects. [Place of publication not identified]: Lulu Com.

Pham, A. & Pham, P. (2012). Scrum in action. Boston, MA: Course Technology.

Rossberg, J. & Olausson, M. (2012). Pro Application lifecycle management with Visual Studio 2012. Berkeley, CA: Apress.

Ruhe, G. & Wohlin, C.(2014) Software project management in a changing world.

Schwalbe, K. (2014). Information technology project management. Boston, MA: Course Technology.

Sheedy, D. & Sankaran, S. (2013). Agile Project Management for IT Projects in SMEs: A Framework and Success Factors. ITMR, 3(3), 187. 

Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion?.Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939-948. 

Stare, A. (2014). Agile Project Management in Product Development Projects. Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, 119, 295-304. 

Stare, A. (2014)Agile project management.

Stark, E. (2014). Agile project management quickstart guide. [S.l.]: ClydeBank.

Torrance, M.(2014) Agile and Llama for ISD project management.

Wernham, B. (2012). Agile project management for government. London: Maitland & Strong.

White, K. (2013). Practical Project Management for Agile Nonprofits. [Place of publication not identified]: Maven House Press.

Wysocki, R. (2012). Effective project management. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

Wysocki, R.( 2014) Effective complex project management.

Wysocki, R., Kaikini, S., & Sneed, R.(2014) Effective project management.

MyAssignmenthelp.co.uk is a name in assignment writing services that students trust. We offer our assignment writing services for a wide variety of assignment including essays, dissertations, case studies and more. Students can place their order with us anytime as we function 24x7, and get their copies at unbeatable prices. We guarantee that all of our solutions are plagiarism-free.