MANAGEMT7039NA Management of Change

Introduction

The case study is based on the analysis of the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited or ANZ. This organization is considered to be the biggest as well as most successful in Australia and the largest and leading bank in New Zealand. The organization first originated from the Bank of Australia in the year 1835 in Sydney. The Melbourne office of the organization was established in the year 1838 and presently the headquarters of ANZ is also located in this location. The organization has a huge number of shareholders in Australia and ANZ has its operations in many other countries except New Zealand and Australia which include, Europe, Dubai, the Pacific, Asia and US (Arnold et al. 2015). The organization has been maintaining its profitable performance since the time of its inception. They were able to hold their position and profits even in the year 2008, where there was global financial crisis.

ANZ has been split into mainly five divisions which include, New Zealand, Australia, Asia Pacific. The retail sector of the organization mainly delivers services like, mortgages, credit cards, savings, transaction banking and deposits. The organization has been divided into many divisions which include, Wealth management, commercial banking, institutional and OTSS or Operations, Technology and Shared Services (Buble, Jurasand Mati? 2014). The discussion in the case study is mainly based on the change management policy and strategy of ANZ.

Discussion of the three questions

Answer 1 - Leadership style or the elements related to change

John McFarlane was appointed at the post of the CEO of ANZ in the year 1990 after the organization had faced a tough time within few years. The program related to the transformation of the organization was designed by McFarlane along with his management team and the major aim of this program was to achieve sustainable and competitive advantage for ANZ that would last for a long term. After the appointment of McFarlane in the position of CEO ANZ bank had seen better performance related to the finances and John had received positive reviews related to his style of leadership. The 1990s was a time when distrust was spread in the banking industry of Australia. This was a result of the closures of many branches of the banks and the increase in the banking charges as well (Canterino,Cirella and Shani 2017).

The perception if the Australian citizens towards the banks was that there was something wrong going on the sector due to which they had lost the trust of people. McFarlane was appointed in the organization at this time of crisis. The major steps that were taken by McFarlane included the criticism of the banks for the retreating from the rural communities, stopped the closure of the branches and also addressed the issue related to the lack of women employees in the senior ranks. He was considered to be the first who had taken the issue of corporate social responsibility or CSR in a serious manner. He was talented in his field was able to sense the trends before his competitors and try to adapt the operations of the organization accordingly. The initiatives that were taken under the leadership of McFarlane rapidly changed the perception of the Australian citizens for the banking industry (Cooper 2015).

The change that was promised by McFarlane arrived quite early in the organization. The main action that was taken by McFarlane was related to the cost-cutting drive that was introduced related to job-cuts in the different branches of the organization. He also aimed at lowering the risk profile of the organization by investing in the emerging markets. The operations in the head-office of ANZ was restructured, streamlined and hundreds of staff were emptied from the premises. The cost-to-income ratio of the bank was the highest at the time of appointment of McFarlane, however, the ratio was brought down to the lowest early in his term of working in ANZ. The organization started shifting concentration from corporate clients to the retail clients so that the business can be increased (DuBois et al. 2015).

The first step related to the transformation of the organization was taken in the year 2000. The major aim of this transformation was to convert ANZ into “the bank with a human face”. The strategy that was introduced by McFarlane and the leadership team under him was named as Perform, Grow and Breakout. McKinsey and Co. was appointed by ANZ so that they can conduct a detailed study about the culture of the bank. The study that was conducted by McKinsey & Co. revealed many problems related to the existing values of the bank, the values of the employees and the ways by which they perceive the bank (Farrell, Kawecki and Branham 2017). The organization had some positive values which were related to result orientation and goals. However, many of the employees had the feeling that ANZ was comprised of extreme hierarchy and bureaucracy and the control of information by the organization is also quite high. The major change that was being made in the culture is related to the development of the values based on the input of the employees and not the values that are dreamt by the senior managers of the organization (Fernandez 2017).

The study conducted by McKinsey’s had compared ANZ to other leading organizations of the country. ANZ fared well in terms of operational and financial performance, however, the organization had a fall in the other areas which included the values. The study was made based on 11 measures which include, aspiration or mission, goals or targets, feedback related to the performance of the business unit, organizational approach, control and coordination, consequence management, operational control, financial control, motivation related to rewards, motivation related to opportunities and motivation related to values. McFarlane then implemented the strategy related to Perform, Grow and Breakout (Keskes 2014).

The major element related this strategy is the Breakout which is mainly focussed on the cultural transformation of the organization. After the implementation of this strategy ANZ created a process related to cultural transformation and the major initiatives related to this process are, breakout charters, breakout workshops and breakout consulting. The Breakout workshops were mainly dedicated towards the personal as well as emotional development of the employees. The Breakout charters are related to the are related to the business projects of the organization that are related to the changes in process and transformation of culture. Breakout consulting is related to the process by which the consulting and diagnostic services are provided so the they can assist the business units (Malhotra and Hinings 2015). The Breakout program was implemented on every employee in the organization across all the units of business. The program lasted for a period of maximum two or three days and the major aim of the program was give the employees the tools and the time to think deeply about their motivating factors. The program was also aimed towards helping the organization in increasing the employee engagement in the various work processes. This program helped the employees in recognising their aims and the areas of advancement as well (McCleskey 2014).

The change in the culture of ANZ was brought McFarlane after thorough study of the present culture and thereby implementing meaningful change. This process further required performance management of the employees to build the people capital as well as the Breakout strategy. The three major phases that are related to the performance management process of ANZ are mainly, performance planning, coaching related to performance and assessment of the performance. The objectives that are set for the performance management process of the organization need to be measurable and clear (Monzani, Ripoll and Peiró 2015). The employees and the managers together need to set the objectives so that the targets are achievable in nature. The performance coaching phase includes the regular meetings of the employees with the managers so that they can develop their abilities all through the year. The performance of the employees need to be discussed with the managers and their progress can be tracked. The major focus is to implement the plans related to the development of the employees and further ensure that the people are supported and given opportunities so that they can succeed in the future. The assessment of the performance is related to the review of the performance of the employees within the year (Nanjundeswaraswamy and Swamy 2014).

The above discussed points are therefore the major features of the transformation of the organization after the appointment of McFarlane as the CEO of ANZ.

Answer 2 - Internal change in culture

McFarlane introduced many programs that were thorough and clear in nature and were mainly designed for the identification, assessment and the development of talent in the organization. The programs were implemented mainly to help the process of talent development among the managers of the organization. The quality control process of the internal management of talent and the change in culture is related to the external assessment. The major focus of ANZ has always been on the development and learning of the employees at all levels of the job. The global systems are used in the organization to ensure that the right knowledge reaches the right employees and at the perfect time (Saeed et al. 2014).

The internal cultural change was brought in the organization with the help of three leadership programs introduced by McFarlane. The investment in the leadership of the staff mainly starts with recognition and the identification of the potential of leadership within the stream of management. The program that is run within the organization by the HR managers and the line managers was known as “The Emerging Leader Radar Talent” program. This program is mainly related to the identification of the leaders and the assessment of their potential as well (Saleem 2015).

The implementation of the programs related to the engagement of employees and their development had to face some major challenges in ANZ. The main challenge was related to the engagement of all the employees in a huge organization like ANZ. Another challenge that was faced by McFarlane was gaining the support of all the employees regarding the change in the culture of the organization. The strategy that was taken to address these challenges were the implementation of the changes in both the top management as well as the lower level employees, instead of starting the process from the management and the then the employees. The main aim of McFarlane was to build high levels of trust between the employees, the management and the CEO of the company (Sethuraman and Suresh 2014).

The staff surveys on the internal basis had shown significant improvement after implementation of the different programs. The satisfaction levels have shown steady increase from 50% in the year 1997, to 62% in the year 2001, 78% in 2002 and 85% in the year 2004. The achievement related to the increased levels of employee satisfaction have helped ANZ focus their concentration on more complex issues like engagement of the employees which is related to the levels up to which the staff are committed towards their employer and are motivated to give their best performance to the organization. ANZ was able to address this challenge as well by achieving the level of 58% in the year 2004 and this percentage rose to 63% in the year 2005 (Shani and Noumair 2017). The success related to the engagement of the employees of ANZ in the work process of the organization has been increasing since then and this has helped ANZ to gain the position of having the most engaged workforce in a global organization. The change in the culture of the organization is an ongoing process and the leaders who implement these strategies need to learn a lot during this process.

Another major issue was faced by ANZ during the tenure of John McFarlane. This issue was related to the time when the bank was exposed to the industry of US telecommunications. The collapse of the industry during the start of the year 2000 had affected the organization immensely. The abilities of McFarlane regarding the management of the senior employees also came into question (Sommer, Sprog and Andersen 2017). The bank had to face many challenges from its competitors like Commonwealth during the tenure of McFarlane. Some of the wrong decisions that were taken by him had affected the organization negatively.

Answer 3 - Attributes of the leaders

John McFarlane was brought in the organization during its crisis period and he did his best to bring back the position of ANZ. The initiative that was by McFarlane to address the issues that were faced by ANZ was to convert the bank in to “the bank with a human face”. Another major step included the importance that was given by McFarlane to corporate social responsibility. McFarlane had the thought of involving the employees in setting the targets and objectives for ANZ. The leadership style of McFarlane mainly stressed on the issue of employee engagement. McFarlane was successful in making changes in the culture of the organization by achieving high levels of employee engagement (van Prooijen and de Vries 2016).

The new CEO of ANZ after McFarlane was Michael Smith and he was qualified enough to take the organization forward. Under the leadership of Michael Smith ANZ has proved to stable and strong and has qualified as one of the many AA rated organizations in the world. Smith aimed at bringing ANZ to the topmost position by increasing the capital, improvement of liquidity and strengthening of the balance sheet. The restructure and the change in brought in the employee base had resulted in the loss of jobs for many employees in ANZ. The leadership of Smith was therefore more focussed towards the efficiency and the profitability of the organization rather the employee engagement (Sethuraman and Suresh 2014).

Conclusion

The report can be concluded with the learning the leadership style of the companies affects the culture of the employees. The transformation of an organization and bringing changes in the culture is not an easy process for the employees as well as the management. Transformation is an ongoing process and it involves the managers and the employees. The managers can also learn a lot from the process of transformation in the organization. It can therefore be said that organizational change is affected by the leadership style.

References

Arnold, K.A., Connelly, C.E., Walsh, M.M. and Martin Ginis, K.A., 2015. Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(4), p.481.

Buble, M., Juras, A. and Mati?, I., 2014. The relationship between managers’ leadership styles and motivation. Management: journal of contemporary management issues, 19(1), pp.161-193.

Canterino, F., Cirella, S. and Shani, R., 2017. Leading organizational transformation: an action research study. Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Cooper, D., 2015. Effective safety leadership: Understanding types & styles that improve safety performance. Professional Safety, 60(2), p.49.

DuBois, M., Hanlon, J., Koch, J., Nyatuga, B. and Kerr, N., 2015. Leadership styles of effective project managers: Techniques and traits to lead high performance teams. Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance, and Marketing, 7(1), p.30.

Farrell, M., Kawecki, B. and Branham, R., 2017. Collaboration, Communication, and Partnerships for Effective Organizational Transformation.

Fernandez, S., 2017. The impact of leadership styles on values and performance. Journal of Health Visiting, 5(1), pp.34-37.

Keskes, I., 2014. Relationship between leadership styles and dimensions of employee organizational commitment: A critical review and discussion of future directions. Intangible Capital, 10(1).

Malhotra, N. and Hinings, C.B., 2015. Unpacking continuity and change as a process of organizational transformation. Long Range Planning, 48(1), pp.1-22.

McCleskey, J.A., 2014. Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), p.117.

Monzani, L., Ripoll, P. and Peiró, J.M., 2015. The moderator role of followers’ personality traits in the relations between leadership styles, two types of task performance and work result satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), pp.444-461.

Nanjundeswaraswamy, T.S. and Swamy, D.R., 2014. Leadership styles. Advances in management, 7(2), p.57.

Saeed, T., Almas, S., Anis-ul-Haq, M. and Niazi, G.S.K., 2014. Leadership styles: relationship with conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 25(3), pp.214-225.

Saleem, H., 2015. The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, pp.563-569.

Sethuraman, K. and Suresh, J., 2014. Effective leadership styles. International Business Research, 7(9), p.165.

Shani, A.B.R. and Noumair, D.A. eds., 2017. Research in organizational change and development. Emerald Group Publishing.

Sommer, F.M., Sprog, J. and Andersen, R.N., 2017. Research workshops as a Means to individual and organizational learning and transformation. In OLKC2015.

van Prooijen, J.W. and de Vries, R.E., 2016. Organizational conspiracy beliefs: Implications for leadership styles and employee outcomes. Journal of business and psychology, 31(4), pp.479-491.

Are you in dire need of assignment help in the UK? Can’t figure out who can help you whenever you find yourself thinking, “Wouldn’t it be great if I could pay someone to do my assignment?” With Myassignmenthelp.co.uk, you can fulfil your desires without any hassle.

Send us your requirements, and our paper writers will take care of your assignment worries quickly. So now, you don't have to worry about, "Where can I find someone to do my assignment for me in the UK?” Instead, let our experts provide you with the best assignment help in London, Bristol, Manchester, Liverpool and more!