Reliability Capability Maturity Model

Discuss about the Reliability Capability Maturity Model.

Engineering projects need to be managed by proper systematic engineering practices. Systematic engineering practices are essential for planning process of engineering projects on a larger scale. Roots of the systematic engineering are in principles, fundamentals, associated management, and engineering sciences (Kerzner, 2017). Projects of larger scale need an effective management to operate the project in a systematic way without any risk. Projects of large scale are to be considered top priority for the management. In such projects, the term project management is defined as the practice of initiating, planning, executing, and controlling the project till the closing of project to meet or achieve the goals and success criteria of the project for a specific time period (Kerzner, 2017). This process of completing a project in a systematic way is much needed in engineering projects. Engineering projects are associated with the same level of risk as that of the level engineering practices are involve in the project. In these engineering projects, associated with high risk, projects management has much importance (Bartlit, Sankar, & Grimsley, 2011). This discussion briefly describes the basics of project management such as systems management, organizational structures, form, culture, engineering risks associated, risk management, portfolio alignment, business value, and organizational maturity (Bartlit, Sankar, & Grimsley, 2011).

Engineering project management consists of the systems management. In the past few decades the management philosophies and organizational theories have undergone a drastic change with the emergence of different strategic project management approaches to the management. In the last 4-5 decades different theories have been developed and state the need of a systems management as an effective communication need. Engineering projects include subsystems which need to be provided with an effective communication to the other systems (Kerzner, 2017). After the development of these theories executives have realised the need of effective communication in engineering projects and introduced a separate management for the communication management throughout the project life cycle. As the engineering projects are associated with initiation, planning, execution, and implementation of different operation, importance of communication management or systems management increases significantly. Engineering projects are complex in operations and they need to be executed in the specified sequence depending on the order of operation sequence (Laudon & Laudon, 2011).

Such engineering projects have an organizational structure to be followed at each stage of the processes. This organizational structure is defined as a stable, either spontaneous or planned, patter of interaction and actions members of the organization undertake to achieve the goals of the organization (Kerzner, 2017). This definition of organizational structure is based on the assumption that the organizational structure is purposeful. This purposefulness of the organizational structure defines that this structure is an instrument for the organization governing people, used to direct the course of different activities to achieve the organization goals (Graham, et al., 2011). Models of organizational structure, a particular structure dimensions’ configuration, direct and shape the order or way in which members of the organization perform their individual tasks in achieving goals of the organization. This structure is completely different in different organizations (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2015). In the past few decades these has been a hidden revolution or development of the organizational structures. Management of such engineering projects has been realized that the organization must possess a dynamic structure which means organizations must be capable of quick restructuring. This structure of an organization is related or associated with the working culture of an organization (Kerzner, 2017). Employees working on such engineering projects need to be familiar with the organizational structure as they follow a particular culture in the organization. Culture of an organization is one of the success determining factors of management practices in engineering projects especially in projects associated with complex engineering practices. Engineering projects like offshore drilling and oil refinery require more defined structural culture for the success (Zheng, Yang, & McLean, 2010). Unfortunately even today, many organizations do not realise the necessity of organizational structure and culture until it is too late to control the risk associated with these practices and results in facing disastrous accidents like deep-water horizon oil spill and Texas oil refinery explosion (Kerzner, 2017).

Project management of many commercial engineering programmes, in its starting days, most of the project decisions were strongly favoured by the cost and schedule of the project. This trend was just because at that time cost and schedule were the only element engineering project management knew.

Today technology has pushed its limits and makes it easy to complete the projects of less than one year. For such projects the technological environment is considered known and stable but when it comes to the projects of more than one year time duration, it is essential to consider the technology forecasting (Graham, et al., 2011). Technical world claims for doubling the computer performance in every two years and engineering technology in every three years. This continuous change in the technology makes it difficult for the project managers to define and plan the projects of three or four years accurately (Bhat, Peleg-Gillai, & Sept, 2006). Most of the engineering projects are of minimum 3-4 years. In this case projects managers have to consider this change in technology and assess the risks involved in such planning in the middle of the project. In engineering projects the term risk is probability and impact measure instead of the achieving the goals set for the project. There at the intersection of different functions of project performed by the managers and engineers, risk management lies (Martinsuo, 2013). If we look historically, the risk management had focused on management elements like cost and schedule more, and its focus was less on the issues related to the technology as the technology was not this much advanced at that time. Today this advanced technology requires special attention of the project management in order to mitigate the risks of such engineering projects. For example, the deep-water horizon oil spill and Texas oil refinery explosion were the result of poor management of technical elements of the management system (Ceria, Saxena, & Stubbs, 2012).

Risk management process of engineering projects should not consider the identifying of risk only. It should also consider the risk mitigating elements and prepare an effective strategy to minimize these identified risks (Bartlit, Sankar, & Grimsley, 2011). These strategies must also consider a formal planning of different activities, estimation of probability an impact of these risks on the project, a proper handling strategy to minimize or mitigate the risk, and its ability off monitoring the project progress while reducing these risks to a level. Probability and Impact are the two primary components of risk for a given event (Graham, et al., 2011).

When it comes to the literature and researches, risk management is defined as an act or process which deals with the risk. Studies states that the risk management is not a separate project management activity rather it is an element of the effective project management. Risk management of engineering projects must be coupled with different key processes of the projects, including not limited to system engineering, scope, schedule, risk management, quality, and cost. An effective risk management is always proactive rather than being reactive. For example, in case of Texas oil refinery explosion and Deep-water horizon oil spill, risk management was reactive not proactive which results in such disastrous accidents (Bartlit, Sankar, & Grimsley, 2011).

Risk management is an element of the project portfolio. This portfolio of project management has received an extra attention in the last few years as the organizations undertaking more projects at the same time. Project portfolio is a collection of different single projects handled by single sponsorship and compete for taking an advantage in the market (Kerzner, 2017). Main motive of project portfolio is to manage the resources and other elements of the project in such a way that co-ordinate the projects in a group and also manage interface between different projects. This focuses on the alignment or scheduling of the different projects and programmes according to the strategy of organization. Also maintain a balance between project risks and benefits of the projects (Bartlit, Sankar, & Grimsley, 2011). When risk occurs, it impacts at least one portfolio objective of the organization’s strategy significantly in a positive or negative way.

Project management also defines the business value as an informal term used for the all forms of values that determine the well-being or health of the organization in long term. The term business value expands the value concept of business beyond economic values of the organization including other values like, customer value, channel value, employee value, alliance value, societal value, supplier value, and managerial value (Graham, et al., 2011). Most of these values does not direct measured in terms of monetary. The measurement of the business value is produced in terms of revenue growth, customer satisfaction, wallet share, market share, profitability, cross-sell ration, and relationship duration.

These business values are most required to achieve by the investor in any project. The process by which an investor achieves its business values a life cycle which continues until the goal on an organization or an investor is achieved in terms of business values. This life cycle process is called project portfolio management life cycle (Tikkanen, Kujala, & Artto, 2007). The project portfolio management cycle can improve the performance of an organization using the development activities of fundamental break through type based on focused management (O'Reilly III & Tushman, 2004). Literature review of several studies suggest that the project portfolio management cycle involves five different phases, a) consideration of strategy and orientation of the management for project selection of better strategy alignment, b) evaluation phase of the project in which benefits of the project are evaluated using various evaluation methods, c) selection of the portfolio with continuous comparison of different projects, d) assignment of the organizational resources, these resources are limited in an organization and required constantly by different projects, e) monitoring and control phase that is responsible for recurrently, assessing, and portfolio performance. These five phases complete the life cycle of a project portfolio management (Amaral, Antonio', Araujo, & Madalena, 2009).

Enhancement of the effectiveness of engineering project management is associated with the project management maturity. This concept of project maturity was first developed at the time of movement in total quality management, when the applied statistical process control has shown that the improvement of project management maturity leads the two major things that are, reduction in the variability inherent of the process, and performance of the process get improved (Bartlit, Sankar, & Grimsley, 2011). There are different ways of measuring the capabilities of project processes one of them is to utilize several maturity models. In order to improve the processes it is essential to understand the process very well and cope of employees or organization with the process (Tiku, Azarian, & Pecht, 2007). In other words the organizational maturity can be defined as the measure of its capabilities for a continuous improvement in the particular discipline. In organizations having engineering projects this organizational maturity is most important element to measure the capabilities of the risk management as the risk management of engineering projects is the most critical element for the success of the organization (Horkonen & Kess, 2009).

All the above discussion concludes that the risk assessment and its control are of the top most priority for engineering projects. Engineering projects are more liable to have risks and these risks associated with engineering projects are most critical ones that have more consequences in comparison to the risks of other projects. Therefore, it is necessary to control or mitigate the risks along with the assessment. In engineering projects the risk management is not about being reactive for the consequences but it is all about being proactive for the risk involved. The modern technology advancement also helped to understand, assess, and control these risks. Risk management of engineering projects also needs to be measured for the assessment of its effectiveness (Horkonen & Kess, 2009). The discussion of portfolio alignment, portfolio management life cycle, and organizational maturity shows that how important is the risk management in engineering projects and different method of measuring the risk management efficiency are necessary to understood by the employees and managers of the organization in order to monitor and control the risks of engineering projects (Tolonen, Harkonen, & Haapasalo, 2015).

Bibliography

Amaral, Antonio', Araujo, & Madalena. (2009). Project Portffolio Managemetn Phases: A Technique for Strategy Alignmentq. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 58, 560-568.

Bartlit, F. H., Sankar, S. N., & Grimsley, S. C. (2011). Macondo: The Gulf Oil Dissaster. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling.

Bhat, G., Peleg-Gillai, B., & Sept, L. (2006). Innovators in supply chain security: better security drives business value. Washington DC: Manufacturing Institute.

Ceria, S., Saxena, A., & Stubbs, R. A. (2012). Factor Alignment Problems and Quantitative Portfolio Management. Journal od Portfolio Management, 38(2), 29.

Graham, B., Reilly, W. K., Beinecke, F., Boesch, D. F., Garcia, T. D., Murray, C. A., & Ulmer, F. (2011). Deep-Water: The Gulf Oil Disaster and Future of Offshore Drilling. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon.

Horkonen, J., & Kess, P. (2009). Organizational Maturity and Functional Performance. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 6(2), 147-164.

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systematic Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Willey and Sons.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2011). Essentials of Managemetn Information Systems. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

Martinsuo, M. (2013). Project Portfolio Management in Practice and in Context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 794-803.

O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The Ambidextrous Organization. Harward Bussiness Review, 82(4), 74-81.

Shafritz, j. M., Ott, J. S., & Jang, T. S. (2015). Classics or Organizationa Theory. Cengage Learning.

Tikkanen, H., Kujala, J., & Artto, K. (2007). The Marketing Strategy of a Project-Based Firm: The Four Portfolio Framework. industeial Marketing Management, 36, 194-205.

Tiku, S., Azarian, M., & Pecht, M. (2007). Using a Reliability Capability Maturity Model to Benchmark Electronics Companies. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(5), 547-563.

Tolonen, A., Harkonen, J., & Haapasalo, H. (2015). Product Portfolio Management Process Over Horizontal and Vertical Portfolios. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Managemetn, 8(3), 189-215.

Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking Organizational culture, Structure, Strategy, and Organizational Effectiveness: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771.