Bonanza Offer FLAT 20% off & $20 sign up bonus Order Now
TACC613
AU
Australian National Institute of Management and Commerce
AP Eagers, a well-established player in the automotive industry which operates out of its primary locations of Adelaide, Queensland, Sydney and Darwin, announced their decision to push for a merger and acquisition with the company AHG. AP Eagers already possessed a significant stake AHG and this decision was regarding the purchase of the ordinary shares that were not owned by AP Eagers. In 2019, the merger was projected to be one of the, if not the most powerful automotive retail group in the whole expanse of Australia. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the factors that guide the run-up to a Merger and Acquisition and to assess the viability of the proposed merger.
The industry that both these companies operate in is the automotive business. Whereas the currently 107 years old AP Eagers which was in its 105th year of operation in 2019 operates a business that consists of vehicle dealerships throughout the country, AHG has its business established in the field of sale of pre-used automobiles, along with having additional businesses that include refrigerated transportation. To assess the viability of this merger, it is essential hence, to analyse the state of the industry that it is operating in. The model of choice used to analyse the industry of operation of the acquirer is “Porter’s five force analysis” (Brujil, 2018):
A few observations that can be made with regards to the industry that the acquirer is operating in through the use of available data:
AP Eagers holds the accolades for being a very old player in the markets of Australia. Its 107 years of history have been marked by remarkable growth and market consolidation which is reflected in the growth of its revenues in the first decade of the 21st century. In the advent of the 21st century AP Eager was known to have a total net profit after tax deduction of “$4.3 million which by the year preceding the year of the acquisition had grown to $101.2 million” (eagersautomotive, n.d.). But it has to be acknowledged that there has been a certain decrease in the revenues in the last years and the trend has been continuous and there has been a constant loss in revenues since the 2016-17 (Beer, 2018).
The sale of new cars in the territory of Australia in the year preceding the year of acquisition proposal amounted to a total of 153,153,111 units throughout all territories and this number is the result of decline of 3% on car sales, this is an indicator of prevalent slowdown of demand for automobiles. This gives an insight into the general trend which guided the industry prior to the execution of the acquisition.
As a comparison to the figure described above, there is further analysis on the number of cars that AP Eagers was able to sell in the same year and that number amounts to 59,663 units which accounted for around 5.2% of the total number of sales executed in all of Australia in 2018 (eagersautomotive, n.d.). This again showcases the slowdowns suffered by the Australian automotive retail industry in the years of 2018 and in the years prior to that. It continues a trend of gradual slowdown with a decrease of 1% in number of units AP Eagers sold in 2018 compared to that in 2017.
The sale of used cars also occupies a substantial share of the automotive market in Australia and both AP Eagers and Automotive Holding Group sell pre-used cars as part of their portfolio. The total number of units that AP Eagers was able to sell in the year of 2018 was 24,118. This was its only segment that saw growth, even if marginal, compared to the previous year as AP Eager recorded a marginal growth in sales of 0.4% (eagersautomotive, n.d.). This indicates the only positive trend in the recent years in terms of market sales, but this does not take away the fact that AP Eager is one of the biggest major players with an individual market share of 7.2%.
The acquirer, in the year 2019, enjoyed a substantially strong position in the industry it operated out of, but nonetheless it had a few shortcomings. These shortcoming, along with its strengths will be analysed through a SWOT analysis (Gürel and Tat, 2017):
The most common purpose towards any merger and acquisition within the market is primarily economic gain and market share consolidation. The company identifies the strengths of another company that can add towards its own organisational goals and thereby works towards an acquisition (ÄŒirjevskis, 2019). AP Eager similarly intends to reinforce its already established foothold in the automotive market by acquiring Automotive Holding Group. AP Eager already owns significant shares of AHG and through this acquisition it will buy all ordinary shares that it does not own in the company. This will enable its aging model of operation to innovate through the addition of channels that are possessed by AHG along with adding a few new portfolios which would include refrigerated transportation throughout Australia.
Automotive Holding Group posed as one of the bigger competition that AP Eager had to face in the automotive retail industry of Australia. And given the competitiveness of the Australian car dealership market, the merger on one hand allows the AP Eager to consolidate its market share while on the other hand it allows the acquirer to eliminate one channel of competition, while reinforcing its market presence through the addition of the properties and holding of AHG (Ahmed et al. 2018).
The merger is proposed to aid AP Eager in making positive changes to its revenues as the merger is projected to provide the company with additional streams of incoming revenue. Furthermore, the automotive retail industry has a considerably meagre market concentration which is given by the fact that AP Eagers and Automotive Holding group alone generate approximately 10% of the revenue of the entire automotive retail industry. This ensures that through the merger it can become the largest single entity in the motor vehicle dealer market of Australia.
The other objective that is intended to be accomplished through the execution of this merger is the complete elimination of any other large players from the market which directly leads to an increase in channels for sales which further leads to an increased reach to a greater number of consumers which in turn results in the generation of higher revenues. And being the largest major player in the industry by projected revenue share, the newly formed entity can exercise greater control over the market.
The reasons that may prove to be contrary to the claims made in the proposal made for the Merger and Acquisition are concerning the estimated value that AP Eager assigns to Automotive Holding Group as the valuation may prove to be inappropriate. And in such a case the post-merger process of business integration might prove to have a higher cost than it was originally estimated to cost and this can be further exacerbated by the prevalent financial challenges of 2019.
The market value of an AHG share according to the closing price on 4th of April, 2019 stood at $1.78 and the implied value of each share was presented in the offer consideration at $1.91. Market value was assessed over different measures of volume weighted average price which included its calculation over two days, ten days, thirty days and one hundred and twenty days which had implied values at premiums of 6.91%, 9.57%, 1.06%, 4.02% respectively. In the offer consideration of the deal AHG shareholders were promised to receive one AP Eagers share in exchange of every 3.8 AHG shares owned by them. This pricing is inappropriate as AHG lacked assets in the forms of fully owned properties but mostly operated out of leased properties while AP Eagers owned vast property assets which makes the valuation unreasonable. And additionally, with 2019 displaying a continuation of the negative impact on the growth rate of the market, it can be suggested that the deal is inappropriately timed.
| Comparable Company Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Target Company: AHG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparable Company Multiples | ||||
|
|
| Equity | Enterprise |
| Enterprise value/FY0 |
| Equity value/FY0 | ||
| Company |
| value | value(*) |
| Revenue | EBITDA | EBIT |
| Net Profit |
|
|
| ($MM) | ($MM) |
| (x) | (x) | (x) |
| (x) |
| Eagers Automotive Limited |
| 1,148 | 2,013 |
| 0.48 | 11.56 | 12.70 |
| 11.54 |
| Adairs Limited |
| 370 | 382 |
| 1.21 | 7.34 | 8.44 |
| 12.10 |
| Aumake Limited |
| 62 | 52 |
| 2.40 | -5.73 | -5.63 |
| -6.84 |
| Mean (MV(C)/VI(C)) |
|
|
|
| 1.37 | 4.39 | 5.17 |
| 5.60 |
| Median (MV(C)/VI(C)) |
|
|
|
| 1.21 | 7.34 | 8.44 |
| 11.54 |
| VI(T) - Target firm value indicator |
|
|
|
| Revenue | EBITDA | EBIT |
| Net Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
| ($MM) | ($MM) | ($MM) |
| ($MM) |
| Autosports Group Limited |
|
|
|
| 1,692 | 61 | 52 |
| 28 |
| Implied target firm/equity value [(MV(C)/VI(C)) x VI(T)] |
|
|
|
| 2,054 | 447 | 439 |
| 321 |
| Debt ($MM)
|
|
|
|
| 480 | 480 | 480 |
|
|
| Cash ($MM) |
|
|
|
| 14 | 14 | 14 |
|
|
| Shares outstanding (MM) |
|
|
|
| 201 | 201 | 201 |
| 201 |
| Implied equity value ($MM) (**) |
|
|
|
| 1,589 | -19 | -27 |
| 321 |
| Implied equity value per share |
|
|
|
| 7.90 | -0.09 | -0.13 |
| 1.59 |
| Estimated median Equity value per share |
|
|
|
| 0.75 |
|
|
|
|
| Estimated median Equity value per share (excluding Revenue multiple) |
|
|
|
| -0.09 |
|
|
|
|
| Actual equity value per share |
|
|
|
| 1.70 |
|
|
|
|
| Implied premium/discount |
|
|
|
| 126% |
|
|
|
|
| Implied premium/discount (excluding Revenue multiple) |
|
|
|
| -1946% |
|
|
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| * Enterprise value = Equity value + Total debt - Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ** Implied equity value (for Revenue, EBITDA and EBIT multiples) = Implied target firm value - Debt + Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ahmad, S., & Khan, M. (2019). Tesla: Disruptor or Sustaining Innovator. Journal of Case Research, 10(1).
Ahmed, F., Manwani, A., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Merger & acquisition strategy for growth, improved performance and survival in the financial sector. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 5(4), 196-214.
Beer, A. (2018). The closure of the Australian car manufacturing industry: Redundancy, policy and community impacts. Australian geographer, 49(3), 419-438.
Bruijl, G. H. T. (2018). The relevance of Porter's five forces in today's innovative and changing business environment. Available at SSRN 3192207.
ÄŒirjevskis, A. (2019). The role of dynamic capabilities as drivers of business model innovation in mergers and acquisitions of technology-advanced firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(1), 12.
Dertwinkel-Kalt, M., & Wey, C. (2020). Multi-product bargaining, bundling, and buyer power. Economics Letters, 188, 108936.
Driven together timeline. (n.d.). Eagers Automotive. Retrieved from:https://www.eagersautomotive.com.au/timeline/
Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: a theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51).
Lansbury, R. D., Wright, C. F., & Clibborn, S. (2017). Who Will Make Our Cars? Global Lessons from the Demise of Australia’s Auto Industry. LERA For Libraries, 21.
Perkins, G., & Murmann, J. P. (2018). What does the success of Tesla mean for the future dynamics in the global automobile sector?. Management and Organization Review, 14(3), 471-480.
Webb, J. (2019). The future of transport: Literature review and overview. Economic Analysis and Policy, 61, 1-6.
Wells, P., Wang, X., Wang, L., Liu, H., & Orsato, R. (2020). More friends than foes? The impact of automobility-as-a-service on the incumbent automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119975.
Yang, H., Luo, J., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Supplier encroachment under nonlinear pricing with imperfect substitutes: Bargaining power versus revenue-sharing. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(3), 1089-1101.
Do you wish you could receive law assignment help from top lawyers in the country? Now you can hire only the best industry professionals on Myassignmenthelp.co.uk. In addition, our experts provide you with in-depth dissertation help to overcome the usual hassles of writing assignments.
Additionally, you can find managers from reputable companies going out of their way to provide reliable management assignment help. Their guidance is crucial when preparing for examinations and writing research papers. Hence, whenever you wonder, "Can't someone do my assignment in the UK?” don’t settle for anything less than the best academic stalwarts on Myassignmenthelp.co.uk.
Upload your Assignment and improve Your Grade
Boost Grades