EDU5SGT Sociolinguistics And Language Teaching

Introduction

The evaluation of the linguistic landscape is a comparatively recent field that includes theoretical linguistics, sociolinguistics, anthropology, sociology, philosophy, and cultural geography. It has been stated by Blommaert & Maly (2016), that Landry and Bourhis coined the word Linguistic Landscape in an article published in 1997. The linguistic landscape of a specific area, city, or metropolitan area is characterised as the language of community road markings, advertisement posters, street names, city names, business shop fronts, and large - scale system on government offices. Indeed, the linguistic landscape is the environment – made up of avenues, intersections, circus acts, gardens, and buildings – in which modern societal everyday discourse actually occurs. As a result, this scene is sociosymbolically significant because it recognises – and therefore acts as the logo of – cultures, populations, and territories. As per the discussion of Blommaert (2016), the linguistic landscape is significant not only as a context to our daily lives, but also as a precious commodity for language development. It determines how the individuals communicate as a group and defines their individual identities. In accordance to these, the best part is that it is available anywhere, is accessible to all, and is completely free. The constructivist approach where more and more than one dialect is used is referred to it as the language policy in such situations. It denotes further use of than one tongue in verbal communication, and hence multilingualism. A place where people speak French, English, and Spanish is an illustration. It has been discussed by Gorter (2018), that the public and semi - public indicators installed in that location should be in all the above languages to ensure that everybody understand the information. The government or other organizations who wish to pass information to the media about a topic use public signals to display information or a statement of national interest. Thus, according to Huebner (2016), to draw more buyers and boost revenue, advertising indicators advertise a product or service. Linguistic Landscape is divided into four categories: visual environment, linguistic landscape, aural countryside, and oral landscape. In this paper, there would be a discussion and an analysis of the linguistic landscape of Melbourne in Victoria Australia. Further, there would be recommendations regarding designing of the same, because of the current issues of linguistic landscape that are prevailing in the region

Discussion

Linguistic landscape of Melbourne

As per the discussion of Malinowski (2015), for the sixth year in a row, Melbourne was named the most sustainable city in the world in 2016. The region has a variety of tourist destinations that appeal to both local and foreign visitors. Inhabitants of this place have embraced multiple and new traditions as a result of the city's ongoing interaction and intermingling between various citizens. English language is the most widely spoken language, particularly in official settings (Blommaert & MAly, 2016). Greek, Vietnamese, Italian, Mandarin, Cantonese, and Arabic are some of the other communities present in this area, speaking their native tongue, in some of the area's commercial establishments. However, this is under evolution and change and the majority of citizens no longer speak English. According to reports, three out of ten people are speaking a language other than English in the present day scenario. There are more number of population who speak languages other than English in some of the capital's outskirts. It has been stated by Yao & Gruba (2020), that between 2001 and 2011, the number of Mandarin speaking people raised, allowing the language to be the second predominant language spoken worldwide after English. It was said to be the country with the largest Greek-speaking populace outside of Europe (Yao & Gruba, 2020). Individuals in this city mixed ways of speaking from various languages. Nevertheless, it was discovered that English was the most widely spoken language at home, with 68.1 percent using it. Chinese was one of the other languages spoken, accounting for 3.6 percent of the total populace. Greek, Italian, and Vietnamese were also spoken in households, with each language spoken by over 100,000 people (Yao, 2020)..

One area of research looked at the representation of languages in multinational settings, but the use of the Chinese was seen as indicating the existence of a group of immigrants in such research. For instance, Manan et al. (2014) demonstrated how the Asian population interpreted their vocabulary in the face of aggressive policy. Along with the use of English in the immigrant community that demonstrated immensely powerful financial situation, Chinese had turned into an important popular and glamorous dialect. The Chinese language was highlighted as a sign of commercialization in another linguistic landscape study. Putra (2019) argues that using Chinese in an industrialised Western city economic benefit to the goods and services provided, as well as enhancing the area's appeal as a tourist attraction. Also Przymus & Kohler (2018), genuine ‘Chineseness' was depicted in community based advertising in a variety of visual elements that worked to promote a sense of commercialisation through a variety of symbols and images.

The place that had been examined in this context of multi linguistic differences is the Waverly International Hotel in Melbourne. The main reason for visiting this place had been the presence of various people, and different cultures that went to the place. It was a great experience as it provided me with the opportunity to analyse the linguistic landscape, and the oral language that they were speaking of.

As per the discussion of Jenkins & Mauranen, (2019), as previously said, linguistic landscape applies to the use of expression in symbols. The language form is graphical conceptual in this case. Since the posters are displayed in big, bright letters, anyone in the region can see what's written on them. The linguistic landscape is concerned with how various languages are being used in symbols to convey information to people. It has been discussed by Izadi& Parvaresh (2016), that many indicators are defined in a variety of languages that refer to the communities and their dialects spoken by the people who live in the places where they are used. Many studies have been conducted in the field of linguistic landscape. Similar words are spoken in various areas by diverse persons.

As per the statement of Przymus & Kohler (2018), sociolinguistics is the study of how societal factors influence the usage of a language in a culture. The protagonists are made up of societal values and aspirations held by members of a society. Unlike language anthropology, which emphasizes on the effects of language on community, sociolinguistics evaluates the effects of culture on communication. Sociolinguistics is strongly connected to other fields of research that are similar in some respects but not in others. As per the discussion of Archer, et.al (2018), in the accessible sociolinguistics evidence, this study will investigate how Melbourne's culture has influenced the languages utilized. The justification while using a certain language in a specific location is either familiarity or a government law requiring its use as a dominant language. The use of unique languages in certain fields has a variety of consequences, depending on the language controls in place. It has been discussed by Pennycook (2018), that linguistic landscape design is the product of government policy. It relates to the context of this report, which examines the impact of Melbourne's tongues on Australia's language system. During the study in Melbourne, it became clear that the majority of banners, posters, as well as other advertising signs are written in English, indicating that English is the city's language environment. Also as per the statement of Lo Bianco & Slaughter (2016), the presence of English-language advertisements demonstrates the difference in language use. Other languages widely spoken by city residents are not included. The study did not take into account the existence of other languages, assuming that every Melbourne citizen communicates and absorbs English. The use of English in all signs demonstrates the region's preference for the language, effectively rendering it monolingual. Castles, Vasta & Ozkul (2020) state that even after the capital's multilingual initiatives, the general societal linguistic landscape has shifted toward monolingualism. It has turned English into a critical socio-symbolic sign in which residents' social lives are formed by their use of the language. This is due to people's familiarity with the language and the dialect. Thus automatically, the English language turned to be the dominant emblem of the linguistic communities in the city.

Also as per the discussion of Castles, Vasta & Ozkul (2020), the study of elements of the linguistic landscape explains how humans communicate with one another. Communication is critical in communicating emotions in interactions. Conversation is only possible when both parties speak the same language and can comprehend one another. English is the most widely spoken language in Melbourne (Pennycook, 2018). The majority of the population speak it in industry and other types of trade. The fact that the town's linguistic landscape is English has brought the people together so they can freely communicate with one another in this more common language. Furthermore, English piqued the interest of those who wished to learn the language (Jenkins & Mauranen, 2019). Through this study, thus it has been helpful to get hold of the linguistic landscape of the region.

People's lives are shaped by the language policy in a manner that allows them to connect to one another. Since they are interested in the shared vocabulary used during symbols, they are able to communicate quickly. As per the discussion of Lo Bianco & Slaughter (2016), later on, they declare it to be their national language. According to Izadi & Parvaresh (2016), english has influenced the citizens of Melbourne in such a way that even those who speak a different language have undertaken the steps to learn English, and also most people would speak upwards of one dialect in a city where English is the native tongue. The aim of this research is to determine how the language used as part of the linguistic landscape has influenced the people in that country. It also aids in comprehending the ability of the locals to communicate with the dialect (Prymus & Kohler, 2018).

Current issues in the linguistic landscape in Melbourne

In order to properly understand and access the fact that Australia is a multi-diverse nation, there needs to be a critical examination of the essential engagement that the non-indigenous communities have with the indigenous groups or the population, the ethnic communities in Australia are created by the immigrants of Asia. As per the discussion of Dominguez (2017), there are several issues that these communities face. Most of it is because of the gap between these communities. Further this is because the linguistic differences, and there is much more work that needs to be done in this respect by the state and the territorial government. It has been stated by Buchori & Dobinson (2015), that the shortfall and the problem arises after the examination of the fact that the Australia’s second language teaching needs to be present from the early childhood to the tertiary level.

It has also been narrated by Buchori & Dobinson (2015), that there really are over 250 languages spoken in Melbourne. As a means of self-identification, the various ethnic groups utilize foreign dialects. To retain the traditions of the communities, some of the residents use their traditional tongues. The reason for the Somali people living here to speak Somali, according to their beliefs and statements, is to preserve their culture and traditions (Rangan, et.al., 2015). The Somali people live in 44 of Victoria's 1546 neighbourhoods. Somali is the most widely spoken language in these areas, which they plan to hand on to subsequent generations. Also according to Karidakis & Aunachalam (2016), the presence of numerous communities in Melbourne and Victoria has necessitated the creation of legislation to protect the rights of languages and dialects.

Melbourne's culture has influenced its people to disregard the several cultures that occur and to conform to English as their primary medium of communication. Beyond their houses, the people communicate in English. As per the discussion of Gorter & Cenoz (2015), they only use native as well as other tongues in their homes. Sociolinguistics is the study of how culture affects the language that is used in a group. Melbourne's history influenced the adoption of English as the population's primary language (Gorter & Cenoz, 2015). Inhabitants who had different interests and variations in cultures were pressured to use English. The most commonly used expression on ads and advertising was English, rendering it the predominant culture. This authority is mostly due to the civilization’s thoughts of shaping it into the chief dialect. It has been stated by Kiesling (2019), that in Melbourne, the use of English has indeed been maximised in every manner, resulting in a lack of knowledge of many other tongues that are not prevalent. The indicators used in advertisements, which are translated into English, are an indication of where English has been maximised, rendering it the linguistic environment of the location. According to the discussion of McEwan, Sterland & McPhillips (2020), the establishment of English as the national language resulted in the extinction of other vernaculars. Since these dialects are only used under rare instances, some communities have lost interest in studying them. In this scenario, civilization discriminated against other cultures in order to establish English as the official language (McEwan, Sterland & McPhillips, 2020). This has been one of the major cultural issue that had been predominant in Melbourne, Australia. 

As per the discussion of Loring & Ramanathan (2016), what should be noted is that there are nor failures in languages only, in Melbourne. The government of Australia has been facing several other issues. Because of the linguistic landscape, there has been a significant decrease in the number of international students, from the year of 1960to 2010. This declination has mainly occurred in the case of native speakers Burke (2017). Since they do not feel comfortable in communicating in a foreign country, even with their linguistic capabilities, is a major issue. This thus does not provide any benefit in the case of the increased interconnectedness, in the global community. In this aspect, it has been argued by Faulkner –Bond & Sireci (2015) that since the foreign language capability of Australia is on a rise, and is increasing because of the immigration, there is lesser need to provide time and resources to the implementation of the second language learning language policy. However, simultaneously, it has been discussed by Sibirsky & Taylor (2017), that how much it is important that there should be a second language learning. What is lacking in the nation is the unity and the diversity which the nation and the region claims to have.

The Waverly International Hotel is well-known in Melbourne and serves cuisine to tourists from all over Australia. All of the restaurant's activities, including its commercials, are conducted in English. The culture in which it is situated has influenced English to be the predominant dialect. Despite the existence of other languages, English has remained the most widely spoken. As per the discussion of Kiesling (2019), although this is a commercial and marketing purpose, it has its negative aspects because it ignores all the other languages.  Its use falls under the category of social linguistics. Men made up 48.53 percent of Melbourne's community, while women made up 51.47 percent. At the hotel, nevertheless, both men and women spoke English. It has been stated by McGraw & van Leent (2018), that English was used during the billboards so that everyone, regardless of gender and culture, could read them. Sexual identity has no impact on the linguistic landscape since the vocabulary used is identifiable by all people regardless of gender, so the proportions of males and females have little bearing on the language policy of the region (Forrest, Lean & Dunn, 2016).

There are potential problems and issues with the perspective that because of immigration there is an increase in the foreign language speakers. It has been discussed and stated by Forrest, Lean & Dunn (2016), that the collective commitment of the Australian nation should not be depended and based upon the people who reside upon the shore. Multiculturalism is something that the nation claims of, but when there appears the actual discussion of it, it lacks in the linguistic paradigm of the nation. Multiculturalism needs a sincere commitment to participation and mutual responsibility on both aspects for it to succeed. As per the discussion of McEwan, Sterland & McPhillips (2020), in fact, approximately all young Australians are inclined to work in multicultural groups in Australia or in team environments with international customers and industries. Bilingualism is an ability that can help the majority of citizens, and that is something that other governments have highly acknowledged. This is the reason, when it relates to the amount of time the Australian school children spend studying a second or third language, Australia has been in the bottom of the list, in the global educational context (Gorter & Cenoz, 2015).As a result, it is critical that governments at both the state and the territorial or national level get the policy settings correct. At the present, the Australian context have a dismal reputation when it comes to words. Acknowledging that there is a question is the very first step toward a remedy. The second objective and aim should be to create a clear roadmap for this thorny issue in educational policies. It has been stated by Karidakis & Arunachalam (2016), that the Asia Education Foundation (AEF) has conducted extensive recommendations to know this successfully, particularly at the secondary school level. Language research resources should be expanded in senior secondary qualification systems, according to scholars. Governments and educators must consistently include access to the highest language services in order to increase and maintain students' engagement (Castles, Vasta & Ozkul, 2020).The National Policy on Languages (NPL), established in 1987, was Australia's first specific linguistic policies and the first multiple languages educational practice in an English-speaking community. As per the discussion of  Buchori & Dobinson (2015), it actively advocated multiculturalism and ethnic diversity, aiming to make cultural tongues an inherent component of all Australian schoolchildren's curriculum, for example, by providing traditional education frameworks for the analysis of these tongues as second languages. The National Policy on Languages recognised the value of preserving independence movements and assisting families in promoting early home language activities for pre-school students, despite the fact that it neither established nor established critical thinking of reading (Dominguez, 2017).

Recommendations

As per the discussion of Ahearn (2021), after studying Melbourne's linguistic environment, it became clear that certain languages are discriminated against. This necessitates certain behaviour about the use of language in this culture. The following are some suggested approaches that, if implemented, would make use of the language policy in this community more equitable for all citizens.

It has been stated by Alhazmi (2015), that the very first solution or recommendation can be to make use of more than one language in the promotions, commercials or the adverts. It is important to understand that the language of English had been becoming dominant , and if there needs to be recognition of the multicultural diversity, there should be a balance in everything. Thus as per the discussion of Ottenheimer & Pine (2018), there should be more than one dialect upon the posters or billboards. As a result of this initiative, the English language would become less dominant. It would also help in diminishing the common concept that every citizen should be knowing how to converse in English. Therefore there would also be a change in the thoughts of the people and they would be able to understand that other languages are equally important, if they are able to communicate through (Wills & Exley, 2016). Further, there would be a transmission of a clear message across the citizens who are not fluent in understanding English.

The second recommendation that can be helpful is that there should be a creation of another linguistic landscape. It has been noted by Zulferdi (2021), that in no way this means to demean the value of English. But if there is another linguistic landscape, it can be used along with English , and the people can be encouraged to make use of other languages as well. For instance, people should be allowed and should feel comfortable to use another alternative language, such as French or Spanish (Wills & Exley, 2016). This recommendation also serves the same cause of making the language of English a bit less dominant, so that there can be another scope of linguistic language, where people would be able to choose theirs. As per the discussion of Simpson & Wigglesworth (2019), the individuals would be enjoying their own choice and discretion of conversing and using the language that they are comfortable in. this would essentially reduce the obligation to use a particular language.  This can be done if there is a different form of culture that is nurtured in the homes (Jenkins & Mauranen, 2019). The children from the very beginning should be taught to talk, communicate and converse in their mother tongue, learning the mother tongue and their ethnic dialect at home would be ensuring the fact that the children would be accustomed to their cultural ethnicity. It has been stated and discussed by Tagg (2015), that the indigenous languages and their traditions would not be lost. This is one of the very effective recommendations since, this not only allows the ethic languages to be alive but also keeps them vibrant, since they are not in use in the commercial or the public places. Learning another language is both a goal in and of itself, as well as a good analogy for the type of intercultural communication that will be needed if Australia is to flourish in its plurality. Merga & Gardiner (2018) recently argued that Australia's multiple languages culture is now being suffocated by a monolingual community and commitment to education system. By learning a new language, learners are also learning about the heritage and traditions associated with it. They develop the understanding and gain some perspective into an environment other than their own environment, deeper understanding into their own cultures, and a desire to expand their horizons as a result of doing that.

As per the suggestion of Bacalia & Bliss  (2019),the definition of national identity should indeed be revised to better include the aspects in which language choices both welcome and exclude certain portions of the society. Through use of existing language and linguistic standards in the culture is currently attributed to loyalty to political, national, and cultural classes, according to prevailing thinking of national identity. It has been discussed by Blair (2015), that while it is understood that sign owners can use tongues and other conceptual tools to show a similar cultural identity with their populations, it is expected that the creation of a common identity would be viewed negatively, preventing potential customers who are "outsiders" from receiving knowledge and creating transactions. In any emerging context, both comprehensive and exclusive directions must be addressed when contemplating social identity as the impetus for sign creation. As per the discussion of Lo Bianco & Slaughter (2016), this can be ensured if there is more media platforms created, based upon different languages. The cultural identity should be relived through the commercial programs as well as through the media platforms. This is because, it reaches to a greater amount of people. The creation of more media outlets like the magazines, newspapers and the radio, in different local traditional languages would be effective in keeping the native languages alive (castles, VAsta & Ozkul, 2020). This might be helpful for the people of the indigenous groups, and also for the members of the respective language groups. They would not feel left out in the crowd of the English speakers. Further, as per the discussion of Izadi & Parvaresh (2016), they would also receive the information in their traditional and ethnic dialects, as they would be reading articles or listening to the radio, in their local languages.

The fourth recommendation that can ensure a diversified linguistic landscape is that there should be more number of language policies on behalf of the Australian Government, against the language discrimination, what had been discussed, so far, it can be analysed that because of the dominant culture of English language, the other dialects get discriminated and neglected, the states of Victoria, which also includes Melbourne should be implementing in the language policies, that would strictly prevent any actions that can aim at discriminating other linguistic communities (Jenkins & Mauranen, 2019). The polices should be designed in such a manner so that they can protect the indigenous groups, and also to those who arrive at Melbourne from the international contexts.

The last suggestion or recommendation would include, encouraging more number of local events. Encouragement of the local events and the cultural programs would allow the participation of the indigenous communities and the groups. As per the discussion of Yao & Gruba (2020), this would be able to promote the cultural practices and would relive the histories and the traditions. The cultural events can include the presentations of various activities and programs, constructed and designed or organised in the local dialects. These would be making sure that there is a promotion of the local languages, through the daily contexts and examples of such events (McEwan, Sterland & McPhillips, 2020).

Conclusion  

Thus from the above discussion, it can be concluded that the linguistic landscape of the Melbourne is English. With the presence of English language as the most dominant culture and dialect of Melbourne, there has been several issues, which have not been able to respect the choices of the indigenous population in the city. The linguistic dynamics has made it mandatory of the people to know and communicate in English language as it has been the most important language of conversation. However the issues that are present is that because of such a perception, the other local languages are getting discriminated, there have been presence of other languages as well within this paradigm such as the French, Mandarin, Spanish and others, which have been almost demeaned and what rules over the is English. Thus with the visit if the Waverly International Hotel, it had been possible for me to identify these issues, understand the importance of the linguistic differences and also how these can be solved. There have also been an outline of how the use of the local languages within the city can be encouraged and how the people can work towards reducing their differences in terms of the dialects and languages. Therefore from the above discussion and analysis it can be recommended that the solution is that there should be proper understanding of the need of maintaining the cultural traditionalism and for this reason the media outlets and the social platforms should be coming to the forefront with their initiative of launching and resenting the programs and information in multiple languages. This can not only benefit in maintaining the diverse ideas but also reach a maximum number of people, who are natives and who have immigrated, future, the solutions also lie in the government policies where there should be inclusion of a foreign language in the school and educational institutions. Thus along with the dominant paradigm of English Language in Melbourne it is essential to change the contexts ad allow the inclusion of the other languages as well, so that there is no indigenous or native communities that re left out, in this manner, there would also be a strong united bond, and the nation can preach multiculturalism and diversity, through the visit of Waverly International Hotel, I could reach to a conclusion that there needs to be a change and something for the benefit of the foreign immigrants as well. This ca be possible with the intervention of the government.

References:

Ahearn, L. M. (2021). Living language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. John Wiley & Sons.

Alhazmi, A. (2015). Linguistic aspects of Arabic-English code switching on Facebook and radio in Australia. International journal of applied linguistics and English literature, 5(3), 184-198.

Archer, R., Russell-Smith, J., Kerins, S., Costanza, R., Edwards, A., & Sangha, K. K. (2018). The North Australia Cultural Landscape. Sustainable Land Sector Development in Northern Australia: Indigenous rights, aspirations, and cultural responsibilities, 8(9), 10-11.

Bacalja, A., & Bliss, L. (2019). Representing Australian Indigenous voices: Text selection in the senior English curriculum. English in Australia, 54(1), 43-52.

Blair, K. (2015). Young adults’ attitudes towards multiculturalism in Australia: Tensions between the multicultural state and the intercultural citizen. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 36(4), 431-449.

Blommaert, J. (2016). The conservative turn in linguistic landscape studies. Ctrl+ Alt+ Dem, 5.

Blommaert, J., & Maly, I. (2016). Ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis and social change. Language and superdiversity, 191, 211.

Buchori, S., & Dobinson, T. (2015). Diversity in teaching and learning: Practitioners' perspectives in a multicultural early childhood setting in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 71-79.

Burke, J. (2017). 9. Linguistic Diversity Among Swahili-Speakers: A Challenge for Translation in Australia. In Translating for the Community (pp. 156-173). Multilingual Matters.

Castles, S., Vasta, E., & Ozkul, D. (2020). Australia. In Controlling Immigration (pp. 128-150). Stanford University Press.

Domínguez Cruz, C. A. (2017). Raising critical awareness of the linguistic landscape: an experience with a group of pre-service English teachers in Colombia.

Faulkner-Bond, M., & Sireci, S. G. (2015). Validity issues in assessing linguistic minorities. International Journal of Testing, 15(2), 114-135.

Forrest, J., Lean, G., & Dunn, K. (2016). Challenging racism through schools: teacher attitudes to cultural diversity and multicultural education in Sydney, Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(3), 618-638.

Gorter, D. (2018). Methods and techniques for linguistic landscape research: About definitions, core issues and technological innovations. Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource, 38, 57.

Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2015). Translanguaging and linguistic landscapes. Linguistic landscape, 1(1-2), 54-74.

Huebner, T. (2016). Linguistic landscape: history, trajectory and pedagogy. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 19(3), 1-11.

Izadi, D., & Parvaresh, V. (2016). The framing of the linguistic landscapes of Persian shop signs in Sydney. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2), 182-205.

Jenkins, J., & Mauranen, A. (Eds.). (2019). Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: Insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe. Routledge.

Karidakis, M., & Arunachalam, D. (2016). Shift in the use of migrant community languages in Australia. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development, 37(1), 1-22.

Kiesling, S. F. (2019). English in Australia and new Zealand. The handbook of world Englishes, 70-86.

Kiesling, S. F. (2019). English in Australia and new Zealand. The handbook of world Englishes, 70-86.

Lo Bianco, J., & Slaughter, Y. (2016). Language policy and education in Australia.

Loring, A., & Ramanathan, V. (Eds.). (2016). Language, immigration and naturalization: Legal and linguistic issues. Multilingual Matters.

Malinowski, D. (2015). Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1-2), 95-113.

Manan, S. A., David, M. K., Dumanig, F. P., & Naqeebullah, K. (2014). Politics, economics and identity: Mapping the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 31-50. doi:10.1080/14790718.2014.905581

McEwan, T., Sterland, S., & McPhillips, K. (2020). Participation and engagement in Catholic parish life in Australia: Examining the impact and importance of cultural and linguistic factors. In Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Volume 31 (pp. 162-188). Brill.

McGraw, K., & van Leent, L. (2018). Textual constraints: Queering the senior english text list in the Australian curriculum. English in Australia, 53(2), 28-39.

Merga, M., & Gardiner, V. (2018). The role of whole-school literacy policies supporting reading engagement in Australian schools. English in Australia, 53(3), 37-50.

Nash, J. (2016). Is linguistic landscape necessary?. Landscape Research, 41(3), 380-384.

Ottenheimer, H. J., & Pine, J. M. (2018). The anthropology of language: an introduction to linguistic anthropology. Cengage Learning.

Pennycook, A. (2018). 4. Linguistic Landscapes and Semiotic Assemblages. In Expanding the linguistic Landscape (pp. 75-88). Multilingual Matters.

Przymus, S. D., & Kohler, A. T. (2018). SIGNS: Uncovering the mechanisms by which messages in the linguistic landscape influence language/race ideologies and educational opportunities: Linguistics and education. Linguistics and education, 44, 58-68.

Putra, A. A. E. (2019). The Bilingualism in Road Sign, from The Perspective of The Linguistic Landscape (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).

Rangan, H., Bell, K. L., Baum, D. A., Fowler, R., McConvell, P., Saunders, T., ... & Murphy, D. J. (2015). New genetic and linguistic analyses show ancient human influence on baobab evolution and distribution in Australia. PloS one, 10(4), e0119758.

Sibirsky, S., & Taylor, M. C. (2017). Language into language: Cultural, legal and linguistic issues for interpreters and translators. McFarland.

Simpson, J., & Wigglesworth, G. (2019). Language diversity in Indigenous Australia in the 21st century. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(1), 67-80.

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.

Willis, L., & Exley, B. (2016). Language variation and change in the Australian curriculum: English: Integrating sub-strands through a pedagogy of metalogue. English in Australia, 51(2), 74-84.

Yao, X. (2020). Material narration of nostalgia: The linguistic landscape of a rural township in Australia. Sociolinguistic Studies, 14(1-2), 7-31.

Yao, X., & Gruba, P. (2020). A layered investigation of Chinese in the linguistic landscape: A case study of Box Hill, Melbourne. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 302-336.

Zulferdi, L. A. (2021). The English Use of Indonesian Students in Australia: Expectations, Perceptions, and Strategies. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 1-19.

Looking for the best assignment help in the UK? Look no further! We have got the best assignment paper writers to back you up with quality solutions on the go. So, if you are wondering, “Who will do my assignment for me?” or “Can I pay someone to do my assignment?” simply count on our expertise and soar high in your academic pursuits. No matter whether you are looking for essay help, coursework help, dissertation help or primary homework help, we have got your back. Connect with us today and allow our experts to craft the finest of academic papers exclusively for you.